Optimizing Levothyroxine Dose Adjustment After Thyroidectomy With a Decision Tree

被引:21
作者
Chen, Stephen S. [1 ]
Zaborek, Nick A. [1 ]
Doubleday, Amanda R. [1 ]
Schaefer, Sarah C. [1 ]
Long, Kristin L. [1 ]
Pitt, Susan C. [1 ]
Sippel, Rebecca S. [1 ]
Schneider, David F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Surg, 600 Highland Ave,K6-100E Clin Sci Ctr, Madison, WI 53792 USA
关键词
REPLACEMENT; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.025
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: After thyroidectomy, patients require Levothyroxine (LT4). It may take years of dose adjustments to achieve euthyroidism. During this time, patients encounter undesirable symptoms associated with hypo- or hyper-thyroidism. Currently, providers adjust LT4 dose by clinical estimation, and no algorithm exists. The objective of this study was to build a decision tree that could estimate LT4 dose adjustments and reduce the time to euthyroidism. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis on 320 patients who underwent total or completion thyroidectomy at our institution. All patients required one or more LT4 dose adjustments from their initial postoperative dose before attaining euthyroidism. Using the Classification and Regression Tree algorithm, we built various decision trees from patient characteristics, estimating the dose adjustment to reach euthyroidism. Results: The most accurate decision tree used thyroid-stimulating hormone values at first dose adjustment (mean absolute error = 13.0 mu g). In comparison, the expert provider and naive system had a mean absolute error of 11.7 mu g and 17.2 mu g, respectively. In the evaluation dataset, the decision tree correctly predicted the dose adjustment within the smallest LT4 dose increment (12.5 mu g) 79 of 106 times (75%, confidence interval = 65%-82%). In comparison, expert provider estimation correctly predicted the dose adjustment 76 of 106 times (72%, confidence interval = 62%-80%). Conclusions: A decision tree predicts the correct LT4 dose adjustment with an accuracy exceeding that of a completely naive system and comparable to that of an expert provider. It can assist providers inexperienced with LT4 dose adjustment. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 106
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Association of Surgeon Volume With Outcomes and Cost Savings Following Thyroidectomy A National Forecast [J].
Al-Qurayshi, Zaid ;
Robins, Russell ;
Hauch, Adam ;
Randolph, Gregory W. ;
Kandil, Emad .
JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2016, 142 (01) :32-39
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, LEVOTHYROXINE DRUG I
[4]   Levothyroxine dose following thyroidectomy is affected by more than just body weight [J].
Baehr, Kara Meinke ;
Lyden, Elizabeth ;
Treude, Kelly ;
Erickson, Judi ;
Goldner, Whitney .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2012, 122 (04) :834-838
[5]   Prospective Intervention of a Novel Levothyroxine Dosing Protocol Based on Body Mass Index after Thyroidectomy [J].
Elfenbein, Dawn M. ;
Schaefer, Sarah ;
Shumway, Cynthia ;
Chen, Herbert ;
Sippel, Rebecca S. ;
Schneider, David F. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2016, 222 (01) :83-88
[6]   The Economic Impact of Levothyroxine Dose Adjustments: the CONTROL HE Study [J].
Ernst, Frank R. ;
Barr, Peri ;
Elmor, Riad ;
Sandulli, Walter ;
Thevathasan, Lionel ;
Sterman, Arnold B. ;
Goldenberg, Jessica ;
Vora, Kevin .
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2017, 37 (01) :71-83
[7]  
Ianiro G, 2014, EUR REV MED PHARMACO, V18, P451
[8]   Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package [J].
Kuhn, Max .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2008, 28 (05) :1-26
[9]   Predicting thyroxine requirements following total thyroidectomy [J].
Mistry, Dipan ;
Atkin, Stephen ;
Atkinson, Helen ;
Gunasekaran, Sinnappa ;
Sylvester, Deborah ;
Rigby, Alan S. ;
England, R. James .
CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2011, 74 (03) :384-387
[10]   Using Body Mass Index to Predict Optimal Thyroid Dosing after Thyroidectomy [J].
Ojomo, Kristin A. ;
Schneider, David F. ;
Reiher, Alexandra E. ;
Lai, Ngan ;
Schaefer, Sarah ;
Chen, Herbert ;
Sippel, Rebecca S. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 216 (03) :454-460