How to write a systematic review

被引:386
作者
Wright, Rick W.
Brand, Richard A.
Dunn, Warren
Spindler, Kurt P.
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Barnes Jewish Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, St Louis, MO USA
[2] Clin Orthopaed & Related Res, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Rehabil, Nashville, TN USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Div Gen Internal Med & Publ Hlth, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802c9098
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is the combination of the best available research evidence with clinical experience and patient needs. The concept of EBM as a part of clinical decision making has become increasingly popular over the last decade. In the hierarchy of studies meta-analysis and systematic reviews occupy the highest levels. A systematic review of a clinical question can be performed by following a relatively standard form. These techniques as described here can be performed without formal training. Systematic reviews conducted in this fashion can be used as a higher form of current concepts or as review articles and replace the traditional expert opinion narrative review.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 29
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration [J].
Altman, DG ;
Schulz, KF ;
Moher, D ;
Egger, M ;
Davidoff, F ;
Elbourne, D ;
Gotzsche, PC ;
Lang, T .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) :663-694
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Evidence- based medicine
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, SYSTEMATIC REV HLTH, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470693926
[4]   A COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF METAANALYSES OF RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF CLINICAL EXPERTS - TREATMENTS FOR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
ANTMAN, EM ;
LAU, J ;
KUPELNICK, B ;
MOSTELLER, F ;
CHALMERS, TC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (02) :240-248
[5]  
Atkins D, 2004, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V328, P1490
[6]   METHODOLOGIC GUIDELINES FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS IN HEALTH-CARE FROM THE POTSDAM CONSULTATION ON METAANALYSIS [J].
COOK, DJ ;
SACKETT, DL ;
SPITZER, WO .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 48 (01) :167-171
[7]   SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS - IDENTIFYING RELEVANT STUDIES FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS [J].
DICKERSIN, K ;
SCHERER, R ;
LEFEBVRE, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6964) :1286-1291
[8]   PUBLICATION BIAS IN CLINICAL RESEARCH [J].
EASTERBROOK, PJ ;
BERLIN, JA ;
GOPALAN, R ;
MATTHEWS, DR .
LANCET, 1991, 337 (8746) :867-872
[9]   Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German [J].
Egger, E ;
ZellwegerZahner, T ;
Schneider, M ;
Junker, C ;
Lengeler, C ;
Antes, G .
LANCET, 1997, 350 (9074) :326-329
[10]  
Egger M, 1998, BRIT MED J, V316, P140