Povidone-iodine spray technique versus traditional scrub-paint technique for preoperative abdominal wall preparation

被引:18
作者
Moen, MD [1 ]
Noone, MB [1 ]
Kirson, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Advocate Lutheran Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Urogynecol, Park Ridge, IL USA
关键词
skin preparation; wound infection;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2002.129922
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The study was conducted to compare povidone-iodine spray and traditional scrub-paint techniques in reducing abdominal wall bacteria during preoperative preparation. STUDY DESIGN: Sixty patients scheduled to undergo vaginal surgery were recruited for study. Cultures of the abdominal skin were performed before and after preparation with two techniques: a traditional 5-minute iodophor soap scrub-paint on one half and povidone-iodine aqueous spray on the other. Multiple pairwise comparisons were performed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. A P value of .05 was considered statistically significant in all analyses. RESULTS: The mean number of colonies for spray after 1 minute was 1.83 +/- 3.16, for spray after 3 minutes was 0.40 +/- 1.15, and after 5-minute scrub was 0.87 +/- 2.97. Both techniques, the spray after 3 minutes and the 5-minute scrub, were statistically more effective at reducing bacterial counts than the spray after 1 minute. There was no statistically significant difference between the spray after 3 minutes and the scrub techniques. CONCLUSION: Povidone-iodine applied as a spray and left to dry for 3 minutes appears as effective as the traditional scrub-paint technique in reducing abdominal wall bacteria before abdominal surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1434 / 1436
页数:3
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
BURKE JF, 1961, SURGERY, V50, P161
[2]   5-YEAR PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 23,649 SURGICAL WOUNDS [J].
CRUSE, PJE ;
FOORD, R .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1973, 107 (02) :206-210
[3]   PLASTIC SURGICAL ADHESIVE DRAPE - EVALUATION OF ITS EFFICACY AS A MICROBIAL BARRIER [J].
FRENCH, MLV ;
EITZEN, HE ;
RITTER, MA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1976, 184 (01) :46-50
[4]  
GILLIAM DL, 1990, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P258
[5]   Supplemental perioperative oxygen to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection [J].
Greif, R ;
Akça, O ;
Horn, EP ;
Kurz, A ;
Sessler, DI .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (03) :161-167
[6]  
Hagen K S, 1995, AORN J, V62, P393, DOI 10.1016/S0001-2092(06)63580-1
[7]   Infection control in the operating room:: Current practices or sacred cows? [J].
Lafrenière, R ;
Bohnen, JMA ;
Pasieka, J ;
Spry, CC .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2001, 193 (04) :407-416
[8]  
Lister J, 1867, Br Med J, V2, P246
[9]   A randomized trial of surgical scrubbing with a brush compared to antiseptic soap alone [J].
Loeb, MB ;
Wilcox, L ;
Smaill, F ;
Walter, S ;
Duff, Z .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 1997, 25 (01) :11-15
[10]  
LORENZ RP, 1988, J REPROD MED, V33, P202