Uncertainty quantification in DIC with Kriging regression

被引:17
作者
Wang, Dezhi [1 ]
DiazDela, P. A. [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Weizhuo [3 ]
Lin, Xiaoshan [4 ]
Patterson, Eann A. [4 ]
Mottershead, John E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Ctr Engn Dynam, Liverpool L69 3GH, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Inst Risk & Uncertainty, Liverpool L69 3GH, Merseyside, England
[3] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Sch Engn, Manchester M15 6BH, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Liverpool, Ctr Mat & Struct, Liverpool L69 3GH, Merseyside, England
关键词
Digital Image Correlation; Measurement error; Kriging regression; Uncertainty quantification; DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION; FULL-FIELD STRAIN; DEFORMATION MEASUREMENTS; ERROR ASSESSMENT; DISPLACEMENT; INTERPOLATION; REDUCTION; GRADIENT; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.optlaseng.2015.09.006
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
A Kriging regression model is developed as a post-processing technique for the treatment of measurement uncertainty in classical subset-based Digital Image Correlation (DIC). Regression is achieved by regularising the sample-point correlation matrix using a local, subset-based, assessment of the measurement error with assumed statistical normality and based on the Sum of Squared Differences (SSD) criterion. This leads to a Kriging-regression model in the form of a Gaussian process representing uncertainty on the Kriging estimate of the measured displacement field. The method is demonstrated using numerical and experimental examples. Kriging estimates of displacement fields are shown to be in excellent agreement with 'true' values for the numerical cases and in the experimental example uncertainty quantification is carried out using the Gaussian random process that forms part of the Kriging model. The root mean square error (RMSE) on the estimated displacements is produced and standard deviations on local strain estimates are determined. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 195
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A hybrid anchored-ANOVA - POD/Kriging method for uncertainty quantification in unsteady high-fidelity CFD simulations
    Margheri, Luca
    Sagaut, Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2016, 324 : 137 - 173
  • [32] Adaptive Locally Weighted Projection Regression Method for Uncertainty Quantification
    Chen, Peng
    Zabaras, Nicholas
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2013, 14 (04) : 851 - 878
  • [33] Calibration after bootstrap for accurate uncertainty quantification in regression models
    Palmer, Glenn
    Du, Siqi
    Politowicz, Alexander
    Emory, Joshua Paul
    Yang, Xiyu
    Gautam, Anupraas
    Gupta, Grishma
    Li, Zhelong
    Jacobs, Ryan
    Morgan, Dane
    [J]. NPJ COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [34] Enhancing uncertainty quantification in drug discovery with censored regression labels
    Svensson, Emma
    Friesacher, Hannah Rosa
    Winiwarter, Susanne
    Mervin, Lewis
    Arany, Adam
    Engkvist, Ola
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE LIFE SCIENCES, 2025, 7
  • [35] ORTHOGONAL BASES FOR POLYNOMIAL REGRESSION WITH DERIVATIVE INFORMATION IN UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION
    Li, Yiou
    Anitescu, Mihai
    Roderick, Oleg
    Hickernell, Fred
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2011, 1 (04) : 297 - 320
  • [36] Uncertainty quantification for nonlinear solid mechanics using reduced order models with Gaussian process regression
    Cicci, Ludovica
    Fresca, Stefania
    Guo, Mengwu
    Manzoni, Andrea
    Zunino, Paolo
    [J]. COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2023, 149 : 1 - 23
  • [37] High-Dimensional Uncertainty Quantification via Tensor Regression With Rank Determination and Adaptive Sampling
    He, Zichang
    Zhang, Zheng
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPONENTS PACKAGING AND MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 11 (09): : 1317 - 1328
  • [38] Efficient uncertainty quantification of stochastic problems in CFD by combination of compressed sensing and POD-Kriging
    Lu, Qinghua
    Wang, Li
    Li, Longsuo
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 396
  • [39] An adaptive Kriging surrogate method for efficient uncertainty quantification with an application to geological carbon sequestration modeling
    Mo, Shaoxing
    Shi, Xiaoqing
    Lu, Dan
    Ye, Ming
    Wu, Jichun
    [J]. COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2019, 125 : 69 - 77
  • [40] Geomagnetically induced current uncertainty quantification based on the earth conductivity models constructed by the Kriging method
    Liu, Qing
    Li, JinLong
    Ding, Nan
    Yi, XiaoHu
    Li, Liang
    Zhong, Hao
    [J]. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2023, 214