Facebook vs. Twitter: Social media platform selection for news consumption among undergraduate students

被引:0
作者
Roslan, Nur Widad [1 ]
Abd Rahim, Normaliza
Hamid, Tuan Muhammad Hanif Tuan Ab [2 ]
Roslan, Nur Maisarah [3 ]
Roslan, Siti Nur Aliaa [4 ]
机构
[1] Infrastructure Univ Kuala Lumpur IUKL, Dept Arts & Educ, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[2] Infrastructure Univ Kuala Lumpur IUKL, Arts & Educ Fac, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[3] Al Madinah Int Univ Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[4] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Engn, Seri Kembangan, Malaysia
来源
SEARCH-JOURNAL OF MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION RESEARCH | 2022年 / 14卷 / 03期
关键词
Social media; Facebook; Twitter; news; students; metadiscourse; media ecology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Social media platforms are used by various age groups. Each social media platform has its own targeted age group, as the user's preference for interface, content and visual varies. Therefore, it is important to identify the preference of age group. Metadiscourse is a term for words that are used in a sentence to indicate the direction and purpose of a text. Each social media platform has different types of metadiscourse, depending on the audience. Hence, the objective of this study is to analyse and identify the social media platforms that students prefer to obtain news and what influences their decision in choosing these platforms. Social media platforms in this study are viewed from the perspective of the media ecology theory by McLuhan (1964). The social media platform chosen by students is mainly influenced by the ecosystem of the media itself. The quantitative part of the study administered a questionnaire to 110 students from the Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur (IUKL) to identify and analyse the type of social media platforms that they prefer and interviews were then conducted to support the quantitative findings on what influenced their choice of social media platforms. The findings show that Twitter is the preferred social media platform. Various factors influence the students' choice, which are (a) personal bias, (b) less political influence, (c) trustable source, (d) family/relatives not using the same social media platform, (e) ease of identifying fake news and (f) friends' recommendation. It is hoped that future research can further explore the effectiveness of having different types of social media platforms for friends and family and the benefits for the user.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 129
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Ahmadi Fereshteh, 2022, Illn Crises Loss, V30, P770, DOI 10.1177/10541373211022002
  • [2] Digital Communication: Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Usage for Education Sustainability
    Al-Rahmi, Waleed Mugahed
    Alzahrani, Ahmed Ibrahim
    Yahaya, Noraffandy
    Alalwan, Nasser
    Kamin, Yusri Bin
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (12)
  • [3] Metadiscourse in online advertising: Exploring linguistic and visual metadiscourse in social media advertisements
    Al-Subhi, Aisha Saadi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2022, 187 : 24 - 40
  • [4] Exploring the role of social media in collaborative learning the new domain of learning
    Ansari, Jamal Abdul Nasir
    Khan, Nawab Ali
    [J]. SMART LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2020, 7 (01)
  • [5] Does communicable diseases (including COVID-19) may increase global poverty risk? A cloud on the horizon
    Anser, Muhammad Khalid
    Yousaf, Zahid
    Khan, Muhammad Azhar
    Nassani, Abdelmohsen A.
    Alotaibi, Saad M.
    Abro, Muhammad Moinuddin Qazi
    Xuan Vinh Vo
    Zaman, Khalid
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 187
  • [6] Biri Ylva, 2021, Metadiscourse in Digital Communication: New Research, Approaches and Methodologies, P133
  • [7] Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples
    Campbell, Steve
    Greenwood, Melanie
    Prior, Sarah
    Shearer, Toniele
    Walkem, Kerrie
    Young, Sarah
    Bywaters, Danielle
    Walker, Kim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN NURSING, 2020, 25 (08) : 652 - 661
  • [8] Social Media and Its Role in Friendship-driven Interactions among Young People: A Mixed Methods Study
    Decieux, Jean Philippe
    Heinen, Andreas
    Willems, Helmut
    [J]. YOUNG, 2019, 27 (01) : 18 - 31
  • [9] Fairclough N, 1995, Critical Discourse Analysis, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315834368
  • [10] Gamel O. W., 2021, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V58