Estimating values of environmental impacts of dairy farming in New Zealand

被引:51
作者
Baskaran, Ramesh [1 ]
Cullen, Ross [1 ]
Colombo, Sergio [2 ]
机构
[1] Lincoln Univ, Dept Accounting Econ & Finance, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand
[2] IFAPA, Dept Agr Econ, Granada, Spain
关键词
choice modelling; environmental impacts; New Zealand dairy farming; willingness to pay; MANAGEMENT; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1080/00288230909510520
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
New Zealand is the world's largest exporter of dairy products, supplying about one-third of global trade. The dairy sector strives to maintain international competitiveness by continued increases in productivity and intensification in the use of inputs. Increasing intensity of dairy farming and unsustainable agricultural activities contribute to degradation of several ecosystem services such as clean air and water. The New Zealand dairy industry receives widespread public criticism of its environmental impacts. This paper provides a case study of the intensification of dairy fanning in New Zealand and its detrimental environmental impacts such as nitrate leaching to streams and rivers, methane gas emissions, demands for surface and groundwater for irrigation and reduced variety in pastoral landscapes. To design efficient policies that will induce farmers to adopt more environmentally friendly practices, resource managers and decision makers need information on the relative values attached by the public to these detrimental environmental impacts. The study uses choice modelling method, in particular a mixed logit model, to evaluate these relative values (willingness to pay), incorporating sources of preference heterogeneity (both observed and unobserved heterogeneity) within a sampled population. The research provides information for policy makers that will be useful in designing policy instruments to encourage farmers to reduce the principal harmful effects of dairy farming on the environment.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 389
页数:13
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, FAO AGR SER
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Discrete choice methods with simulation
[3]  
Baskaran R, 2009, AUSTRALAS J ENV MAN, V16, P103
[4]  
Bennett J., 2001, The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation
[5]   Issues and options for future dairy farming in New Zealand [J].
Clark, D. A. ;
Caradus, J. R. ;
Monaghan, R. M. ;
Sharp, P. ;
Thorrold, B. S. .
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2007, 50 (02) :203-221
[6]   Best management practices to mitigate faecal contamination by livestock of New Zealand waters [J].
Collins, Rob ;
Mcleod, Malcolm ;
Hedley, Mike ;
Donnison, Andrea ;
Close, Murray ;
Hanly, James ;
Horne, Dave ;
Ross, Colleen ;
Davies-Colley, Robert ;
Bagshaw, Caroline ;
Matthews, Lindsay .
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2007, 50 (02) :267-278
[7]   New Zealand freshwater management and agricultural impacts [J].
Cullen, Ross ;
Hughey, Kenneth ;
Kerr, Geoffrey .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2006, 50 (03) :327-346
[8]  
Dairy NZ., 2008, NZ DAIRY STAT 2007 0
[9]   Water effluent from New Zealand dairy farms from 1997 to 2000 [J].
Flemmer, Claire L. ;
Flemmer, Rory C. .
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2008, 51 (02) :181-189
[10]  
FORD R, 2006, P FERT LIM RES CTR W, P48