Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing

被引:245
作者
McKone, Elinor [1 ]
Yovel, Galit [2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Dept Psychol, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
SHAPE-BASED MODEL; CONFIGURAL INFORMATION; SPATIAL RELATIONS; OWN-RACE; RECOGNITION; DISCRIMINATION; COMPONENT; REPRESENTATIONS; DISTINCTIVENESS; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.3758/PBR.16.5.778
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Classically, it has been presumed that picture-plane inversion primarily reduces sensitivity to spacing/configural information in faces (distance between location of the major features) and has little effect on sensitivity to local feature information (e.g., eye shape or color). Here, we review 22 published studies relevant to this claim. Data show that the feature inversion effect varied substantially across studies as a function of the following factors: whether the feature change was shape only or included color/brightness, the number of faces in the stimulus set, and whether the feature was in facial context. For shape-only changes in facial context, feature inversion effects were as large as typical spacing inversion effects. Small feature inversion effects occurred only when a task could be efficiently solved by visual-processing areas outside whole-face coding. The results argue that holistic/configural processing for upright faces integrates exact feature shape and spacing between blobs. We describe two plausible approaches to this process.
引用
收藏
页码:778 / 797
页数:20
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Perception of global facial geometry in the inversion effect and prosopagnosia [J].
Barton, JJS ;
Zhao, JH ;
Keenan, JP .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2003, 41 (12) :1703-1711
[2]   Attending to faces: change detection, familiarization, and inversion effects [J].
Barton, JJS ;
Deepak, S ;
Malik, N .
PERCEPTION, 2003, 32 (01) :15-28
[3]   Discrimination of spatial relations and features in faces: Effects of inversion and viewing duration [J].
Barton, JJS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 92 :527-549
[4]   Configural face encoding and spatial frequency information [J].
Boutet, I ;
Collin, C ;
Faubert, J .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2003, 65 (07) :1078-1093
[5]   Recognition of faces and complex objects in younger and older adults [J].
Boutet, Isabelle ;
Faubert, Jocelyn .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2006, 34 (04) :854-864
[6]   Do 7-month-old infants process independent features or facial configurations? [J].
Cohen, LB ;
Cashon, CH .
INFANT AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 10 (1-2) :83-92
[7]   WHY FACES ARE AND ARE NOT SPECIAL - AN EFFECT OF EXPERTISE [J].
DIAMOND, R ;
CAREY, S .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1986, 115 (02) :107-117
[8]   An evaluation of two commonly used tests of unfamiliar face recognition [J].
Duchaine, BC ;
Weidenfeld, A .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2003, 41 (06) :713-720
[9]   The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence [J].
Freire, A ;
Lee, K ;
Symons, LA .
PERCEPTION, 2000, 29 (02) :159-170
[10]   Face recognition in 4- to 7-year-olds: Processing of configural, featural, and paraphernalia information [J].
Freire, A ;
Lee, K .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 80 (04) :347-371