Quality evaluation of primary care service performance What are the problems with the recent Hungarian primary care indicators?

被引:7
作者
Kolozsvari Laszlo Robert [1 ]
Rurik Imre [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Debreceni Egyet, Nepegeszsegugyi Kar, Csaladorvosi & Foglalkozas Egeszsegugyi Tanszek, Debrecen, Hungary
[2] Moricz Zs Krt 22, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
关键词
financing; indicators; performance evaluation; primary care; quality evaluation; HEALTH-CARE; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1556/650.2016.30378
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The Hungarian primary care quality indicator system has been introduced in 2009, and has been continuously developed since then. The system offers extra financing for family physicians who are achieving the expected levels of indicators. There are currently 16 indicators for adult and mixed practices and 8 indicators are used in paediatric care. Authors analysed the influencing factors of the indicators other than those related to the performance of family physicians. Expectations and compliance of patients, quality of outpatient (ambulatory) care services, insufficient flow of information, inadequate primary care softwares which need to be updated could be considered as the most important factors. The level of financial motivations should also be significantly increased besides changes in the reporting system. It is recommended, that decision makers in health policy and financing have to declare clearly their expectations, and professional bodies should find the proper solution. These indicators could contribute properly to the improvement of the quality of primary care services in Hungary.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 335
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
[2]   Clinical Outcomes with β-Blockers for Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials [J].
Bangalore, Sripal ;
Makani, Harikrishna ;
Radford, Martha ;
Thakur, Kamia ;
Toklu, Bora ;
Katz, Stuart D. ;
DiNicolantonio, James J. ;
Devereaux, P. J. ;
Alexander, Karen P. ;
Wetterslev, Jorn ;
Messerli, Franz H. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 127 (10) :939-953
[3]   Improving the quality of morbidity indicators in electronic health records in Swiss primary care A practical approach [J].
Busato, Andre ;
Bhend, Heinz ;
Chmiel, Corinne ;
Tandjung, Ryan ;
Senn, Oliver ;
Zoller, Marco ;
Rosemann, Thomas .
SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2012, 142
[4]   Improving the quality of health care - Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care [J].
Campbell, SM ;
Braspenning, J ;
Hutchinson, A ;
Marshall, MN .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7393) :816-819
[5]   Defining quality of care [J].
Campbell, SM ;
Roland, MO ;
Buetow, SA .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2000, 51 (11) :1611-1625
[6]   EVALUATING QUALITY OF MEDICAL CARE [J].
DONABEDIAN, A .
MILBANK MEMORIAL FUND QUARTERLY-HEALTH AND SOCIETY, 1966, 44 (03) :166-206
[7]  
Godeny S., 2007, DEV CLIN EFFECTIVENE
[8]  
Goodwin N., 2011, Improving the Quality of Care in General Practice - Report of an Independent Inquiry Commissioned by The King's Fund
[9]   Improving the quality of medical care - Building bridges among professional pride, payer profit, and patient satisfaction [J].
Grol, R .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 286 (20) :2578-2585
[10]   Family Physicians' Perceptions and Use of Electronic Clinical Decision Support During the First Year of Implementation [J].
Heselmans, Annemie ;
Aertgeerts, Bert ;
Donceel, Peter ;
Geens, Siegfried ;
Van de Velde, Stijn ;
Ramaekers, Dirk .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2012, 36 (06) :3677-3684