Update on the use of exome sequencing in the diagnosis of fetal abnormalities

被引:45
作者
Ferretti, Lauren [1 ]
Mellis, Rhiannon [2 ]
Chitty, Lyn S. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chelsea & Westminster Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, 369 Fulham Rd, London, England
[2] Great Ormond St NHS Fdn Trust, Great Ormond St, London, England
[3] UCL Great Ormond St Inst Child Hlth, Genet & Genom Med, 30 Guilford St, London, England
关键词
Prenatal; Exome sequencing; Fetal structural abnormalities; Monogenic disorders; NONINVASIVE PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; WHOLE-GENOME; LOW-RISK; FETUSES; DISORDERS; RECOMMENDATIONS; AMNIOCENTESIS; ANOMALIES; LETHAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.05.002
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Unexpected fetal abnormalities detected through ultrasound scanning in pregnancy may have a monogenic aetiology but are difficult to diagnose. Next generation sequencing now enables us to sequence fetal exomes, providing increased resolution and broader diagnostic capability compared to traditional cytogenetic prenatal tests, improving the yield and accuracy of diagnoses and allowing better counselling for expectant parents. Here we review published studies of exome sequencing (ES) for prenatal diagnosis over the last 5 years and address important questions for its clinical implementation, including clinical utility, which groups benefit most, and practical and ethical challenges for interpreting and reporting results. We observe that fetal ES substantially improves diagnostic yield relative to cytogenetic techniques. However, diagnostic rates vary widely between studies, largely attributable to differences in case selection. Recently several large studies report variations in diagnostic yield between phenotypic groups, with fetuses with multisystem abnormalities most likely to receive a diagnosis from fetal ES. Challenges for prenatal ES include the limitations of ultrasound-based fetal phenotyping, the need for rapid return of results in pregnancy, and technical limitations compared to whole genome sequencing. We also consider ethical issues around potential secondary findings and variants of uncertain significance and the complex counselling needs these present. Prenatal ES is a valuable tool to diagnose fetal abnormalities and, as it is implemented in the clinic, more large-scale research will serve to further delineate its clinical utility, as well as generating new knowledge about fetal phenotypes and informing guidelines for case selection, reporting results and genetic counselling.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Prenatal DNA Sequencing: Clinical, Counseling, and Diagnostic Laboratory Considerations [J].
Abou Tayoun, Ahmad N. ;
Spinner, Nancy B. ;
Rehm, Heidi L. ;
Green, Robert C. ;
Bianchi, Diana W. .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2018, 38 (01) :26-32
[2]   Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Akolekar, R. ;
Beta, J. ;
Picciarelli, G. ;
Ogilvie, C. ;
D'Antonio, F. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 45 (01) :16-26
[3]   Actionable exomic incidental findings in 6503 participants: challenges of variant classification [J].
Amendola, Laura M. ;
Dorschner, Michael O. ;
Robertson, Peggy D. ;
Salama, Joseph S. ;
Hart, Ragan ;
Shirts, Brian H. ;
Murray, Mitzi L. ;
Tokita, Mari J. ;
Gallego, Carlos J. ;
Kim, Daniel Seung ;
Bennett, James T. ;
Crosslin, David R. ;
Ranchalis, Jane ;
Jones, Kelly L. ;
Rosenthal, Elisabeth A. ;
Jarvik, Ella R. ;
Itsara, Andy ;
Turner, Emily H. ;
Herman, Daniel S. ;
Schleit, Jennifer ;
Burt, Amber ;
Jamal, Seema M. ;
Abrudan, Jenica L. ;
Johnson, Andrew D. ;
Conlin, Laura K. ;
Dulik, Matthew C. ;
Santani, Avni ;
Metterville, Danielle R. ;
Kelly, Melissa ;
Foreman, Ann Katherine M. ;
Lee, Kristy ;
Taylor, Kent D. ;
Guo, Xiuqing ;
Crooks, Kristy ;
Kiedrowski, Lesli A. ;
Raffe, Leslie J. ;
Gordon, Ora ;
Machini, Kalotina ;
Desnick, Robe ;
Biesecker, Leslie G. ;
Lubitz, Steven A. ;
Mulchandani, Surabhi ;
Cooper, Greg M. ;
Joffe, Steven ;
Richards, C. Sue ;
Yang, Yaoping ;
Rotter, Jerome I. ;
Rich, Stephen S. ;
O'Donne, Christopher J. ;
Berg, Jonathan S. .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2015, 25 (03) :305-315
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, MENDELIOME WHOLE EXO
[5]  
Badeau M., 2017, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD011767.pub2, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD011767.PUB2]
[6]   Whole-genome sequencing is more powerful than whole-exome sequencing for detecting exome variants [J].
Belkadi, Aziz ;
Bolze, Alexandre ;
Itan, Yuval ;
Cobat, Aurelie ;
Vincent, Quentin B. ;
Antipenko, Alexander ;
Shang, Lei ;
Boisson, Bertrand ;
Casanova, Jean-Laurent ;
Abel, Laurent .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (17) :5473-5478
[7]   Promises, pitfalls and practicalities of prenatal whole exome sequencing [J].
Best, Sunayna ;
Wou, Karen ;
Vora, Neeta ;
Van der Veyver, Ignatia B. ;
Wapner, Ronald ;
Chitty, Lyn S. .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2018, 38 (01) :10-19
[8]  
Byrne A., 2017, J PAEDIATR CHILD H, V53, P15, DOI [10.1111/jpc.13494_38, DOI 10.1111/JPC.13494_38]
[9]   Exome sequencing improves genetic diagnosis of structural fetal abnormalities revealed by ultrasound [J].
Carss, Keren J. ;
Hillman, Sarah C. ;
Parthiban, Vijaya ;
McMullan, Dominic J. ;
Maher, Eamonn R. ;
Kilby, Mark D. ;
Hurles, Matthew E. .
HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 2014, 23 (12) :3269-3277
[10]   Rapid prenatal diagnosis using targeted exome sequencing: a cohort study to assess feasibility and potential impact on prenatal counseling and pregnancy management [J].
Chandler, Natalie ;
Best, Sunayna ;
Hayward, Jane ;
Faravelli, Francesca ;
Mansour, Sahar ;
Kivuva, Emma ;
Tapon, Dagmar ;
Male, Alison ;
DeVile, Catherine ;
Chitty, Lyn S. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2018, 20 (11) :1430-1437