Propofol infusion rate does not affect local pain on injection

被引:18
作者
Grauers, A [1 ]
Liljeroth, E [1 ]
Åkeson, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Malmo Univ Hosp 04226, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care, Inst, SE-20502 Malmo, Sweden
关键词
anesthetics; intravenous; human; injections; pain; propofol; time factors;
D O I
10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460405.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Local pain at the site of an i.v. injection of propofol is a well-known problem, particularly in infants. This randomised investigator-blinded crossover study was designed to assess the effect of the i.v. bolus infusion rate on propofol-induced pain at the site of injection. Methods: Thirty unpremedicated patients scheduled for ear-nose-throat or plastic surgery at Malmo University Hospital, Sweden, were given two consecutive 2.0ml injections of propofol 10mg/ml (Diprivan((R)), AstraZeneca, Sweden/UK), at different infusion rates (0.2 or 1.0ml/s), immediately before induction of general anesthesia. Half of the patients (n=15) received the first bolus of propofol over 2s and the second bolus over 10s, and the other half (n = 15) had their injections in reversed order. After each injection, the patient was asked by an investigator to indicate pain intensity on a visual analog scale (VAS) and to report the times of the appearance, maximum point and disappearance of pain. The injections were given approximately 2 min apart. The investigators scoring pain intensity, as indicated by the patients on a 10-point numerical rate scale, were blinded to the order in which the injections were given, as were the patients themselves. Results:, There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence (both 86%) of intensity (median; 25th; 75th percentiles, in VAS units: 3.1; 1.0; 5.3 and 3.3; 1.4; 5.0, respectively) or duration (66 +/- 31 and 73 +/- 26s, respectively) of pain between the faster (1.0ml/s) and slower (0.2ml/s) bolus infusion rates of propofol studied. Conclusions: We conclude that the i.v. bolus infusion rate of propofol does not influence drug-induced local pain on injection, at least not within the infusion rate interval studied. Therefore, adjusting i.v. injection speed does not seem to be a clinically useful tool for reducing the intensity or duration of propofol-induced pain at the site of administration.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 363
页数:3
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]   THE EFFECTS OF SPEED OF INJECTION ON INDUCTION WITH PROPOFOL - A COMPARISON WITH ETOMIDATE [J].
GILLIES, GWA ;
LEES, NW .
ANAESTHESIA, 1989, 44 (05) :386-388
[2]   Pain on injection of propofol with or without infusion of carrier fluid [J].
Liljeroth, E ;
Grauers, A ;
Åkeson, J .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 45 (07) :839-841
[3]   TOURNIQUET AT 50 MM HG FOLLOWED BY INTRAVENOUS LIDOCAINE DIMINISHES HAND PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH PROPOFOL INJECTION [J].
MANGAR, D ;
HOLAK, EJ .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1992, 74 (02) :250-252
[4]   A potential mechanism of propofol-induced pain on injection based on studies using nafamostat mesilate [J].
Nakane, M ;
Iwama, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 83 (03) :397-404
[5]  
Picard P, 2000, ANESTH ANALG, V90, P963
[6]   PROPOFOL - CLINICAL STRATEGIES FOR PREVENTING THE PAIN OF INJECTION [J].
SCOTT, RPF ;
SAUNDERS, DA ;
NORMAN, J .
ANAESTHESIA, 1988, 43 (06) :492-494
[7]   Pain on injection of propofol [J].
Tan, CH ;
Onsiong, MK .
ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 53 (05) :468-476