Reduced habituation to angry faces: increased attentional capture as to override inhibition of return

被引:23
作者
Perez-Duenas, Carolina [1 ]
Acosta, Alberto [1 ]
Lupianez, Juan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Fac Psychol, Dept Expt Psychol, E-18071 Granada, Spain
来源
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG | 2014年 / 78卷 / 02期
关键词
GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER; FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; VISUAL-ATTENTION; SOCIAL PHOBIA; DISCRIMINATION TASKS; SPATIAL ATTENTION; EMOTIONAL FACES; PANIC DISORDER; HAPPY FACES;
D O I
10.1007/s00426-013-0493-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper was to study whether real angry faces do capture attention to the extent of overcoming the inhibition of return (IOR) effect and whether the anxiety level of participants modulates this effect by stressing biases toward threatening stimuli. With this purpose, participants categorized the emotional valence of face targets in a standard spatial cueing procedure suitable to measure IOR. In Experiment 1, participants were selected according to their high vs. low-trait anxiety, whereas in Experiment 2 participants were induced a positive vs. anxiety mood state. The typical IOR effect was observed with neutral and happy face targets, which disappeared with angry face targets. Similar results were observed for all anxiety groups and in both experiments. The results indicate that IOR is overridden when the target is a biologically relevant angry face, as highly relevant targets should suffer less from habituation to attentional capture regardless of anxiety. We suggest that these data show that attentional capture is less likely to habituate for threatening information, so that no cost is measured in detecting new threatening information appearing at recently cued locations.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 208
页数:13
相关论文
共 82 条
[21]   Effects of salience are short-lived [J].
Donk, Mieke ;
van Zoest, Wieske .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 19 (07) :733-739
[22]   Reconceptualizing inhibition of return as habituation of the orienting response [J].
Dukewich, Kristie R. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2009, 16 (02) :238-251
[23]   Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion [J].
Eastwood, JD ;
Smilek, D ;
Merikle, PM .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2001, 63 (06) :1004-1013
[24]   Negative facial expression captures attention and disrupts performance [J].
Eastwood, JD ;
Smilek, D ;
Merikle, PM .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2003, 65 (03) :352-358
[25]  
Ekman P., 1976, Pictures of facial affect
[26]  
Ellsworth PC, 2003, SER AFFECTIVE SCI, P572
[27]  
Eysenck Michael.W., 1992, Anxiety: The Cognitive Perspective
[28]   Neural evidence for the threat detection advantage: Differential attention allocation to angry and happy faces [J].
Feldmann-Wuestefeld, Tobias ;
Schmidt-Daffy, Martin ;
Schuboe, Anna .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 48 (05) :697-707
[29]   Modulation of Focused Attention by Faces Expressing Emotion: Evidence From Flanker Tasks [J].
Fenske, Mark J. ;
Eastwood, John D. .
EMOTION, 2003, 3 (04) :327-343
[30]   Facial expressions of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently? [J].
Fox, E ;
Lester, V ;
Russo, R ;
Bowles, RJ ;
Pichler, A ;
Dutton, K .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 2000, 14 (01) :61-92