Reliability of Foot Posture Index individual and total scores for adults and older adults

被引:30
作者
Aquino, Mariana R. C. [1 ]
Avealar, Bruna S. [1 ]
Silva, Paula L. [2 ]
Ocarino, Juliana M. [1 ]
Resende, Renan A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Sch Phys Educ Phys Therapy & Occupat Therapy, Dept Phys Therapy, Ave Antonio Carlos,6627,Campus Pampulha, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Cincinatti, Dept Psychol, 2600 Clifton Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45220 USA
关键词
Foot posture; Pronation; Supination; Elderly;
D O I
10.1016/j.msksp.2018.02.002
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: Previous studies have suggested that the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) is valid and reliable to evaluate foot posture of adults and children. However, studies with adults had some important limitations. In addition, it is not clear if FPI-6 is reliable for older adults. Variations in foot structure, such as edema, bone callosity and bunions, are more frequent in older adults, which may compromise FPI-6 reliability for this population. Objectives: To investigate test-retest and inter-rater reliability of FPI-6 total and individual scores for the assessment of foot posture of adults and older adults. Methods: Twenty-one adults and 19 older adults participated in this study. The examiners performed FPI-6 on two days of data collection. We used Cohen Weighted Kappa and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Results: For adults, FPI-6 scores demonstrated test-retest reliability varying from fair to substantial and inter-rater reliability varying from fair to almost perfect. For older adults, FPI-6 scores demonstrated test-retest reliability varying from not reliable to moderate and inter-rater reliability varying from fair to almost perfect. The examiners demonstrated more than 80% of agreement in all FPI-6 scores for adults and older adults. Conclusions: The relatively low reliability in light of this high level of agreement suggest that the current version of FPI-6 can be a useful tool to assess foot posture for adults and should be further examined. On the other hand, FPI-6 should be cautiously used for older adults.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 95
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Two simple measures of variability for categorical data [J].
Allaj, Erindi .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2018, 45 (08) :1497-1516
[2]   Foot morphology and foot/ankle injury in indoor football [J].
Cain, Lauren E. ;
Nicholson, Leslie L. ;
Adams, Roger D. ;
Burns, Joshua .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2007, 10 (05) :311-319
[3]   Reliability of the modified foot posture index [J].
Cornwall, Mark W. ;
McPoil, Thomas G. ;
Lebec, Michael ;
Vicenzino, Bill ;
Wilson, Jodi .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 98 (01) :7-13
[4]   The foot posture index, ankle lunge test, Beighton scale and the lower limb assessment score in healthy children: a reliability study [J].
Evans, Angela M. ;
Rome, Keith ;
Peet, Lauren .
JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH, 2012, 5
[5]  
Gwet K.L., 2012, Handbook of Inter-rater reliability, P121
[6]  
Lee Jong Dae, 2015, [The Journal of Korean Society of Physical Therapy, 대한물리치료학회지], V27, P311
[7]   Inexperienced examiners and the Foot Posture Index: A reliability study [J].
McLaughlin, Patrick ;
Vaughan, Brett ;
Shanahan, James ;
Martin, Jake ;
Linger, Gabriel .
MANUAL THERAPY, 2016, 26 :238-240
[8]   Validity of 3 clinical techniques for the measurement of static foot posture in older people [J].
Menz, HB ;
Munteanu, SE .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2005, 35 (08) :479-486
[9]  
Menz HB., 2004, Foot, V14, P2, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0958-2592(03)00047-6
[10]   Inter-rater reliability of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) in the assessment of the paediatric foot [J].
Morrison, Stewart C. ;
Ferrari, Jill .
JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH, 2009, 2