Corticospinal excitability of the biceps brachii is higher during arm cycling than an intensity-matched tonic contraction

被引:39
作者
Forman, Davis [1 ]
Raj, Amita [2 ]
Button, Duane C. [1 ,3 ]
Power, Kevin E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Sch Human Kinet & Recreat, St John, NF A1C 5S7, Canada
[2] Univ Ontario Inst Technol, Fac Hlth Sci, Oshawa, ON, Canada
[3] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Fac Med, St John, NF A1C 5S7, Canada
关键词
motoneuron; transmastoid; transcranial; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; HUMAN UPPER-LIMB; MOTONEURON EXCITABILITY; ISOMETRIC CONTRACTIONS; FICTIVE LOCOMOTION; MOTOR UNITS; MOVEMENT; CAT; MUSCLE; RECRUITMENT;
D O I
10.1152/jn.00210.2014
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Human studies have not assessed corticospinal excitability of an upper-limb prime mover during arm cycling. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether supraspinal and/or spinal motoneuron excitability of the biceps brachii was different between arm cycling and an intensity-matched tonic contraction. We hypothesized that spinal motoneuron excitability would be higher during arm cycling than an intensity-matched tonic contraction. Supraspinal and spinal motoneuron excitability were assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex and transmastoid electrical stimulation (TMES) of the corticospinal tract, respectively. TMS-induced motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and TMES-induced cervicomedullary-evoked potentials (CMEPs) were assessed at three separate positions (3, 6, and 12 o'clock relative to a clock face) during arm cycling and an intensity-matched tonic contraction. MEP amplitudes were 7.2 and 8.8% maximum amplitude of the compound muscle action potential (M-max) larger during arm cycling compared with a tonic contraction at the 3 (P < 0.001) and 6 o'clock (P < 0.001) positions, respectively. There was no difference between tasks during elbow extension (12 o'clock). CMEP amplitudes were 5.2% M-max larger during arm cycling compared with a tonic contraction at the 3 o'clock position (P < 0.001) with no differences seen at midflexion (6 o'clock) or extension (12 o'clock). The data indicate an increase in the excitability of corticospinal neurons, which ultimately project to biceps brachii during the elbow flexion portion of arm cycling, and increased spinal motoneuron excitability at the onset of elbow flexion during arm cycling. We conclude that supraspinal and spinal motoneuron excitability are phase- and task-dependent.
引用
收藏
页码:1142 / 1151
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
BROWNSTONE RM, 1992, EXP BRAIN RES, V90, P441
[2]  
BROWNSTONE RM, 1994, EXP BRAIN RES, V102, P34
[3]   Studies on the corticospinal control of human walking. I. Responses to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex [J].
Capaday, C ;
Lavoie, BA ;
Barbeau, H ;
Schneider, C ;
Bonnard, M .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 81 (01) :129-139
[4]   Corticospinal excitability is lower during rhythmic arm movement than during tonic contraction [J].
Carroll, TJ ;
Baldwin, ERL ;
Collins, DF ;
Zehr, EP .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 95 (02) :914-921
[5]   Amplitude of the maximum motor response (Mmax) in human muscles typically decreases during the course of an experiment [J].
Crone, C ;
Johnsen, LL ;
Hultborn, H ;
Orsnes, GB .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1999, 124 (02) :265-270
[6]   BALLISTIC CONTRACTIONS IN MAN - CHARACTERISTIC RECRUITMENT PATTERN OF SINGLE MOTOR UNITS OF TIBIALIS ANTERIOR MUSCLE [J].
DESMEDT, JE ;
GODAUX, E .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1977, 264 (03) :673-693
[7]   Impaired response of human motoneurones to corticospinal stimulation after voluntary exercise [J].
Gandevia, SC ;
Petersen, N ;
Butler, JE ;
Taylor, JL .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1999, 521 (03) :749-759
[8]   Reciprocal Ia inhibition contributes to motoneuronal hyperpolarisation during the inactive phase of locomotion and scratching in the cat [J].
Geertsen, Svend S. ;
Stecina, Katinka ;
Meehan, Claire F. ;
Nielsen, Jens B. ;
Hultborn, Hans .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2011, 589 (01) :119-134
[9]  
Grillner S., 1981, Compr Physiol, P1179, DOI [DOI 10.1002/CPHY.CP010226, DOI 10.1126/SCIENCE.1245629]
[10]   Electromyographic analysis of pedaling: A review [J].
Hug, Francois ;
Dorel, Sylvain .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (02) :182-198