Corticospinal excitability of the biceps brachii is higher during arm cycling than an intensity-matched tonic contraction

被引:38
|
作者
Forman, Davis [1 ]
Raj, Amita [2 ]
Button, Duane C. [1 ,3 ]
Power, Kevin E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Sch Human Kinet & Recreat, St John, NF A1C 5S7, Canada
[2] Univ Ontario Inst Technol, Fac Hlth Sci, Oshawa, ON, Canada
[3] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Fac Med, St John, NF A1C 5S7, Canada
关键词
motoneuron; transmastoid; transcranial; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; HUMAN UPPER-LIMB; MOTONEURON EXCITABILITY; ISOMETRIC CONTRACTIONS; FICTIVE LOCOMOTION; MOTOR UNITS; MOVEMENT; CAT; MUSCLE; RECRUITMENT;
D O I
10.1152/jn.00210.2014
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Human studies have not assessed corticospinal excitability of an upper-limb prime mover during arm cycling. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether supraspinal and/or spinal motoneuron excitability of the biceps brachii was different between arm cycling and an intensity-matched tonic contraction. We hypothesized that spinal motoneuron excitability would be higher during arm cycling than an intensity-matched tonic contraction. Supraspinal and spinal motoneuron excitability were assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex and transmastoid electrical stimulation (TMES) of the corticospinal tract, respectively. TMS-induced motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and TMES-induced cervicomedullary-evoked potentials (CMEPs) were assessed at three separate positions (3, 6, and 12 o'clock relative to a clock face) during arm cycling and an intensity-matched tonic contraction. MEP amplitudes were 7.2 and 8.8% maximum amplitude of the compound muscle action potential (M-max) larger during arm cycling compared with a tonic contraction at the 3 (P < 0.001) and 6 o'clock (P < 0.001) positions, respectively. There was no difference between tasks during elbow extension (12 o'clock). CMEP amplitudes were 5.2% M-max larger during arm cycling compared with a tonic contraction at the 3 o'clock position (P < 0.001) with no differences seen at midflexion (6 o'clock) or extension (12 o'clock). The data indicate an increase in the excitability of corticospinal neurons, which ultimately project to biceps brachii during the elbow flexion portion of arm cycling, and increased spinal motoneuron excitability at the onset of elbow flexion during arm cycling. We conclude that supraspinal and spinal motoneuron excitability are phase- and task-dependent.
引用
收藏
页码:1142 / 1151
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Premovement Changes in Corticospinal Excitability of the Biceps Brachii are Not Different Between Arm Cycling and an Intensity-Matched Tonic Contraction
    Copithorne, David B.
    Forman, Davis A.
    Power, Kevin E.
    MOTOR CONTROL, 2015, 19 (03) : 223 - 241
  • [2] Differences in corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii between arm cycling and tonic contraction are not evident at the immediate onset of movement
    Forman, Davis A.
    Philpott, Devin T. G.
    Button, Duane C.
    Power, Kevin E.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2016, 234 (08) : 2339 - 2349
  • [3] Cadence-dependent changes in corticospinal excitability of the biceps brachii during arm cycling
    Forman, Davis A.
    Philpott, Devin T. G.
    Button, Duane C.
    Power, Kevin E.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 114 (04) : 2285 - 2294
  • [4] Short-interval intracortical inhibition to the biceps brachii is present during arm cycling but is not different than a position- and intensity-matched tonic contraction
    Alcock, L. R.
    Spence, A. J.
    Lockyer, E. J.
    Button, D. C.
    Power, Kevin E.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2019, 237 (09) : 2145 - 2154
  • [5] Differences in corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii between arm cycling and tonic contraction are not evident at the immediate onset of movement
    Davis A. Forman
    Devin T. G. Philpott
    Duane C. Button
    Kevin E. Power
    Experimental Brain Research, 2016, 234 : 2339 - 2349
  • [6] Phase- and Workload-Dependent Changes in Corticospinal Excitability to the Biceps and Triceps Brachii during Arm Cycling
    Spence, Alyssa-Joy
    Alcock, Lynsey R.
    Lockyer, Evan J.
    Button, Duane C.
    Power, Kevin E.
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2016, 6 (04):
  • [7] Interhemispheric inhibition is different during arm cycling than a position- and intensity-matched tonic contraction
    Compton, Chris T.
    Lockyer, Evan J.
    Benson, Ryan J.
    Power, Kevin E.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2022, 240 (09) : 2425 - 2434
  • [8] Corticospinal excitability to the biceps and triceps brachii during forward and backward arm cycling is direction- and phase-dependent
    Nippard, Anna P.
    Lockyer, Evan J.
    Button, Duane C.
    Power, Kevin E.
    APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2020, 45 (01) : 72 - 80
  • [9] Changes in Corticospinal and Spinal Excitability to the Biceps Brachii with a Neutral vs. Pronated Handgrip Position Differ between Arm Cycling and Tonic Elbow Flexion
    Forman, Davis A.
    Richards, Mark
    Forman, Garrick N.
    Holmes, Michael W. R.
    Power, Kevin E.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
  • [10] Corticospinal-Evoked Responses from the Biceps Brachii during Arm Cycling across Multiple Power Outputs
    Lockyer, Evan J.
    Hosel, Katarina
    Nippard, Anna P.
    Button, Duane C.
    Power, Kevin E.
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2019, 9 (08)