Reasons for failure to deliver National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-adherent care in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer at an NCCN cancer center

被引:52
作者
Erickson, Britt K. [1 ]
Martin, Jovana Y. [2 ]
Shah, Monjri M. [1 ]
Straughn, J. Michael, Jr. [1 ]
Leath, Charles A., III [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Div Gynecol Oncol, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[2] Univ Alabama, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
关键词
Epithelial ovarian cancer; NCCN-adherent care; Treatment disparities; DISPARITIES; QUALITY; GUIDELINES; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.02.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has established guidelines for treating epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) which includes cytoreductive surgery and platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy (CT). The objective of this study was to determine the reasons for failure to deliver NCCN-adherent care at an NCCN cancer center serving a diverse racial and socioeconomic population. Methods. Medical records of women with EOC diagnosed between 2004 and 2009 were reviewed for demographic, clinical, tumor, treatment, and survival data. Independent reviewers determined if their treatment met criteria for being NCCN-adherent. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated with Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared with the log-rank test. Results. 367 patients were identified. 79 (21.5%) did not receive NCCN-adherent care. Non-adherent CT in 75 patients was the most common reason for failure to receive NCCN-adherent care. 39 patients did not complete CT due to treatment toxicities or disease progression. 12 patients received single agent a only and 4 received no a due to comorbidities. 2 patients declined CT. 18 patients died in the postoperative period without receiving CT. 8 patients did not undergo cytoreduction due to disease progression or comorbidities. PFS and OS were improved in the NCCN-adherent cohort (PFS: 5.7 vs. 18.3 months, p < .005) (OS: 11.4 vs. 49.5 months, p < .005). Conclusions. The vast majority of patients at an NCCN cancer center received NCCN-adherent treatment. Reasons for failure to receive NCCN-adherent care were variable, but most did not receive chemotherapy in accordance with guidelines due to comorbidities or disease progression. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 146
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Frontline treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer
    Goh, Jeffrey
    Mohan, G. Raj
    Ladwa, Rahul
    Ananda, Sumitra
    Cohen, Paul A.
    Baron-Hay, Sally
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 11 : 1 - 16
  • [22] Concordance with NCCN treatment guidelines: Relations with health care utilization, cost, and mortality in breast cancer patients with secondary metastasis
    Rocque, Gabrielle B.
    Williams, Courtney P.
    Kenzik, Kelly M.
    Jackson, Bradford E.
    Azuero, Andres
    Halilova, Karina I.
    Ingram, Stacey A.
    Pisu, Maria
    Forero, Andres
    Bhatia, Smita
    CANCER, 2018, 124 (21) : 4231 - 4240
  • [23] Failure of Evidence-Based Cancer Care in the United States The Association Between Rectal Cancer Treatment, Cancer Center Volume, and Geography
    Monson, John R. T.
    Probst, Christian P.
    Wexner, Steven D.
    Remzi, Feza H.
    Fleshman, James W.
    Garcia-Aguilar, Julio
    Chang, George J.
    Dietz, David W.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2014, 260 (04) : 625 - 632
  • [24] Disparities in Receipt of National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guideline-Adherent Care and Outcomes among Women with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Insurance Type
    Ubbaonu, Chimezie D.
    Chang, Jenny
    Ziogas, Argyrios
    Mehta, Rita S.
    Kansal, Kari J.
    Zell, Jason A.
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (23)
  • [25] Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Treatment
    Zeng, Xiangyang
    Yi, Shuijing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2018, 28 (06) : 1085 - 1089
  • [26] Epidemiology and treatment patterns of epithelial ovarian cancer
    Jessmon, Philip
    Boulanger, Talia
    Zhou, Wei
    Patwardhan, Pallavi
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2017, 17 (05) : 427 - 437
  • [27] Breast cancer treatment in the elderly: Do treatment plans that do not conform to NCCN recommendations lead to worse outcomes?
    Agborbesong, Obi
    Helmer, Stephen D.
    Reyes, Jared
    Strader, Lindsay A.
    Tenofsky, Patty L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 220 (02) : 381 - 384
  • [28] Efficacy of a Regional Network for Ovarian Cancer Care
    van Altena, Anne M.
    van den Akker, Petronella A. J.
    de Hullu, Joanne A.
    Ottevanger, Petronella B.
    Aalders, Annet L.
    Gerritse, Rene
    Happel, Martin
    Hoekstra, Marcel P.
    Janssen, Mark-Jan
    Samlal, Rahul A. K.
    Smeets, Kirsten M. W. H.
    Snijders, Marc P. M. L.
    Vasmel, Maria J.
    Vollebergh, Jos H. A.
    Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M.
    Massuger, Leon F. A. G.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (03) : 668 - 675
  • [29] Oncologist Perspectives on Telemedicine for Patients With Cancer: A National Comprehensive Cancer Network Survey
    Tevaarwerk, Amye J.
    Chandereng, Thevaa
    Osterman, Travis
    Arafat, Waddah
    Smerage, Jeffrey
    Polubriaginof, Fernanda C. G.
    Heinrichs, Tricia
    Sugalski, Jessica
    Martin, Daniel B.
    JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2021, 17 (09) : 572 - +
  • [30] Achievement of personalized pain goal in cancer patients referred to a supportive care clinic at a comprehensive cancer center
    Dalal, Shalini
    Hui, David
    Linh Nguyen
    Chacko, Ray
    Scott, Cheryl
    Roberts, Lynn
    Bruera, Eduardo
    CANCER, 2012, 118 (15) : 3869 - 3877