Insights into Grade 2 teachers' enactment of formative assessment in mathematics in selected priority schools in Gauteng

被引:3
作者
Govender, Poomoney [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Africa, Dept Early Childhood Educ, Coll Educ, Pretoria, South Africa
关键词
assessment for learning; compliance; curriculum coverage; developmental; enactment; formative; learning outcomes; mathematics; summative; SOUTH-AFRICA;
D O I
10.15700/saje.v40ns2a1780
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article reports on Grade 2 teachers' perceptions of formative assessment in explaining the phenomenon of the underutilisation of formative assessment practices in mathematics teaching. A qualitative and interpretative case study investigated two Grade 2 teachers' enactment of formative assessment in priority schools in Gauteng. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and observations of lessons. The basic principles of qualitative content analysis were applied during data analysis and guided by the formative assessment theoretical framework proposed by Black and Wiliam (2009). The study revealed that teachers' enactment of formative assessment was limited by their vague understanding of formative assessment and the tensions between formative assessment and curriculum compliance. The study's central claim is that teachers may know about formative assessment, but if they do not understand how children learn and engage in mathematics learning, then they are unlikely to enact it correctly. While teachers who attended the in-service training programme were able to use some of the strategies as singular tools, they were still unable to implement the combined strategies that constitute the formative assessment pedagogy. Hence, the formative assessment practices of teachers bore limited possible returns on investment to improve learning outcomes in mathematics. The unique contribution of this study is its potential to inform teacher development, policy and practice as it yielded important insights while reinforcing and amplifying existing knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:S1 / S10
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, KHANYISA ED SUPPOR 1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, QUALITATIVE RES STAR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CURR ASS POL STAT IN
[4]   Formative assessment: a critical review [J].
Bennett, Randy .
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2011, 18 (01) :5-25
[5]  
Berry R, 2011, EDUC ASIA PAC REG-IS, V14, P89, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0729-0_7
[6]  
Black P., 1998, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, V5, P7, DOI DOI 10.1080/0969595980050102
[7]   Developing the theory of formative assessment [J].
Black, Paul ;
Wiliam, Dylan .
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2009, 21 (01) :5-31
[8]  
BMMA (Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan), 2012, 2012 ANN REP NAT WOM
[9]   Teacher inquiry into formative assessment practices in remedial reading classrooms [J].
Brookhart, Susan M. ;
Moss, Connie M. ;
Long, Beverly A. .
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2010, 17 (01) :41-58
[10]  
Carnoy M., 2012, Prospects, V42, P453, DOI [10.1007/s11125-012-9246-6, DOI 10.1007/S11125-012-9246-6]