Belief rule mining using the evidential reasoning rule for medical diagnosis

被引:22
作者
Chang, Leilei [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Fu, Chao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Wei [4 ]
Liu, Weiyong [5 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Management, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Educ, Key Lab Proc Optimizat & Intelligent Decis Making, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Educ, Engn Res Ctr Intelligent Decis Making & Informat, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China
[4] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Sch Automat, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Sci & Technol China, Div Life Sci & Med, Affiliated Hosp USTC 1, Dept Ultrasound, Hefei 230001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Belief rule mining; Sub-model; Weight and reliability; Evidential reasoning rule; Medical diagnosis;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijar.2020.12.009
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A belief rule mining approach is proposed to generate belief rules with a customized set of criteria by mining from multiple belief rules that are trained using data with varied sets of criteria. As the theoretical basis of the belief rule mining approach, the key concepts are defined, including the weights and reliabilities of cases, criteria, models, and belief rules. Based on the key concepts, multiple sub-models composed of belief rules with varied sets of criteria are initialized and optimized. Then, the optimized sub-models are integrated using the evidential reasoning rule into belief rules with a customized set of criteria. In the belief rule mining process, the weights and reliabilities of the sub models are considered according to the weight and reliability calculation procedures of models proposed in this study. The proposed approach is used to help diagnose thyroid nodules with 527 medical cases, in which its applicability is demonstrated. By comparative experiments, the diagnostic correctness of the proposed approach is verified to be higher than those of the directly-optimized model and the approach without the consideration of reliability. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 291
页数:19
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non-response [J].
Andridge, Rebecca R. ;
Little, Roderick J. A. .
INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW, 2010, 78 (01) :40-64
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, STAT ANAL MISSING DA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Encyclopedia of Public Health, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-5614-7_2569
[4]   Comparative Accuracy of Diagnosis by Collective Intelligence of Multiple Physicians vs Individual Physicians [J].
Barnett, Michael L. ;
Boddupalli, Dhruv ;
Nundy, Shantanu ;
Bates, David W. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (03) :e190096
[5]   Thyroid-hormone therapy and thyroid cancer: a reassessment [J].
Biondi, B ;
Filetti, S ;
Schlumberger, M .
NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2005, 1 (01) :32-40
[6]   Thyroid cancer [J].
Cabanillas, Maria E. ;
McFadden, David G. ;
Durante, Cosimo .
LANCET, 2016, 388 (10061) :2783-2795
[7]   Data-Driven Analysis of Radiologists Behavior for Diagnosing Thyroid Nodules [J].
Chang, Leilei ;
Fu, Chao ;
Wu, Zijian ;
Liu, Weiyong ;
Yang, Shanlin .
IEEE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2020, 24 (11) :3111-3123
[8]   Indirect disjunctive belief rule base modeling using limited conjunctive rules: Two possible means [J].
Chang, Leilei ;
Chen, Yuwang ;
Hao, Zhiyong ;
Zhou, Zhijie ;
Xu, Xiaobin ;
Tan, Xu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2019, 108 :1-20
[9]   Structure learning for belief rule base expert system: A comparative study [J].
Chang, Leilei ;
Zhou, Yu ;
Jiang, Jiang ;
Li, Mengjun ;
Zhang, Xiaohang .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2013, 39 :159-172
[10]   Decision-making with belief functions: A review [J].
Denoeux, Thierry .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2019, 109 :87-110