Digital Impressions in Implant Dentistry: A Literature Review

被引:64
作者
Marques, Simone [1 ]
Ribeiro, Paulo [1 ,2 ]
Falcao, Carlos [1 ,2 ]
Lemos, Bernardo Ferreira [1 ,2 ]
Rios-Carrasco, Blanca [3 ]
Rios-Santos, Jose Vicente [3 ]
Herrero-Climent, Mariano [1 ]
机构
[1] Porto Dent Inst, P-4150518 Porto, Portugal
[2] Fernando Pessoa Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, P-4249004 Porto, Portugal
[3] Univ Seville, Dept Periodontol, Seville 41009, Spain
关键词
digital impressions; implant dentistry; intra-oral scan bodies; intra-oral scanner; accuracy; scanning technique; implant depth; implant angulation;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph18031020
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Introduction. Digital impressions in implant dentistry rely on many variables, and their accuracy, particularly in complete edentulous patients, is not well understood. Aim. The purpose of this literature review was to determine which factors may influence the accuracy of digital impressions in implant dentistry. Emphasized attention was given to the design of the intra-oral scan body (ISB) and scanning techniques. Materials and methods. A Medline, PubMed and EBSCO Host databases search, complemented by a hand search, was performed in order to select relevant reports regarding the appliance of digital impressions in implant dentistry. The search subject included but was not limited to accuracy of digital impressions in implant dentistry, digital scanning techniques, the design and material of the ISBs, and the depth and angulation of the implant. The related titles and abstracts were screened, and the remaining articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected for full-text readings. Results. The literature search conducted for this review initially resulted in 108 articles, among which only 21 articles fulfilled the criteria for inclusion. Studies were evaluated according to five subjects: accuracy of digital impressions in implant dentistry; the design and material of the intra-oral scan bodies; scanning technique; the influence of implants depth/angulations on the digital impression and accuracy of different intra-oral scanner devices. Conclusions. The accuracy of digital impressions in implant dentistry depends on several aspects. The depth/angulation of the implant, the experience of the operator, the intra-oral scanner used, and environmental conditions may influence the accuracy of digital impressions in implant dentistry. However, it seems that ISBs' design and material, as well as scanning technique, have a major impact on the trueness and precision of digital impressions in implant dentistry. Future research is suggested for the better understanding of this subject, focusing on the optimization of the ISB design and scanning protocols.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 20
页数:20
相关论文
共 49 条
[31]   Orthodontic scanners: what's available? [J].
Martin, Catherine B. ;
Chalmers, Elsinore V. ;
McIntyre, Grant T. ;
Cochrane, Heather ;
Mossey, Peter A. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2015, 42 (02) :136-143
[32]   Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure [J].
Menini, Maria ;
Setti, Paolo ;
Pera, Francesco ;
Pera, Paolo ;
Pesce, Paolo .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 22 (03) :1253-1262
[33]   Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses [J].
Mizumoto, Ryan M. ;
Yilmaz, Burak ;
McGlumphy, Edwin A., Jr. ;
Seidt, Jeremy ;
Johnston, William M. .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 123 (01) :96-104
[34]   Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: A systematic review [J].
Mizumoto, Ryan M. ;
Yilmaz, Burak .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2018, 120 (03) :343-352
[35]   Impact of Different Scan Bodies and Scan Strategies on the Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions Assessed with an Intraoral Scanner: An In Vitro Study [J].
Motel, Constantin ;
Kirchner, Elena ;
Adler, Werner ;
Wichmann, Manfred ;
Matta, Ragai Edward .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 29 (04) :309-314
[36]   A COMPARISON OF THE MARGINAL FIT OF CROWNS FABRICATED WITH DIGITAL AND CONVENTIONAL METHODS [J].
Ng, Jonathan ;
Ruse, Dorin ;
Wyatt, Chris .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2014, 112 (03) :555-560
[37]   Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes [J].
Papaspyridakos, Panos ;
Gallucci, German O. ;
Chen, Chun-Jung ;
Hanssen, Stijn ;
Naert, Ignace ;
Vandenberghe, Bart .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (04) :465-472
[38]   Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study [J].
Papaspyridakos, Panos ;
Benic, Goran I. ;
Hogsett, Virginia Lea ;
White, George Shelby ;
Lal, Kunal ;
Gallucci, German O. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (06) :676-681
[39]   Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws [J].
Patzelt, Sebastian B. M. ;
Vonau, Sebastian ;
Stampf, Susanne ;
Att, Wael .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 144 (08) :914-920
[40]   Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology [J].
Pradies, Guillermo ;
Zarauz, Cristina ;
Valverde, Arelhys ;
Ferreiroa, Alberto ;
Martinez-Rus, Francisco .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2015, 43 (02) :201-208