Associating explanatory variables with summary receiver operating characteristic curves in diagnostic meta-analysis

被引:12
作者
Hamza, Taye Hussein [2 ]
van Houwelingen, Hans C. [1 ]
Heijenbrok-Kal, Majanka H. [2 ,3 ]
Stijnen, Theo [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Stat & Bioinformat, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Radiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Diagnostic meta-analysis; Summary ROC curves; Metaregression; Bivariate random effects model; Sensitivity; Specificity; BIVARIATE; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.02.002
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To show how the bivariate random effects meta-analysis model can be used to study the relation between the explanatory variables and the performance of diagnostic tests as characterized by a summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROCC). Study Design and Setting: The subject is discussed by means of a data example in which sensitivity and specificity are available for 149 studies on one of three tests for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. The focus is on comparing SROCCs between different tests adjusted for potential confounders, but the methods can be applied much more generally. Results: Different types of SROCCs can be calculated. The influence of explanatory variables on an SROCC is an ensemble of sensitivity and specificity regression coefficients and covariance parameters. The regression coefficients of the SROCC are estimated and tested, and the percentage explained variability is determined. Under certain assumptions, the SROCCs of different covariate values do not cross. If these are fulfilled, it is much easier to describe the influence of explanatory variables. Conclusions can depend on the type of SROCC. Conclusion: The bivariate random effects meta-analysis model is an appropriate and convenient framework to investigate the effect of covariates on the performance of diagnostic tests as measured by SROCCs. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1284 / 1291
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves [J].
Arends, L. R. ;
Hamza, T. H. ;
van Houwelingen, J. C. ;
Heijenbrok-Kal, M. H. ;
Hunink, M. G. M. ;
Stijnen, T. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2008, 28 (05) :621-638
[2]   Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach [J].
Chu, Haitao ;
Cole, Stephen R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (12) :1331-1332
[3]   Meta-analysis of diagnostic studies: A comparison of random intercept, normal-normal, and binomial-normal bivariate summary ROC approaches [J].
Hamza, Taye H. ;
Reitsma, Johannes B. ;
Stijnen, Theo .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2008, 28 (05) :639-649
[4]   The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability [J].
Hamza, Taye H. ;
van Houwelingen, Hans C. ;
Stijnen, Theo .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (01) :41-51
[5]  
HARBORD RM, 2006, BIOSTATISTICS, V1, P1
[6]   Stress echocardiography, stress sing le-photon-emission computed tomography and electron beam computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of diagnostic performance [J].
Heijenbrok-Kal, Majanka H. ;
Fleischmann, Kirsten E. ;
Hunink, M. G. Myriam .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 154 (03) :415-423
[7]   ESTIMATING DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY FROM MULTIPLE CONFLICTING REPORTS - A NEW METAANALYTIC METHOD [J].
LITTENBERG, B ;
MOSES, LE .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1993, 13 (04) :313-321
[8]   A PARADOX IN INTERPRETATION OF GROUP COMPARISONS [J].
LORD, FM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1967, 68 (05) :304-&
[9]   COMBINING INDEPENDENT STUDIES OF A DIAGNOSTIC-TEST INTO A SUMMARY ROC CURVE - DATA-ANALYTIC APPROACHES AND SOME ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
MOSES, LE ;
SHAPIRO, D ;
LITTENBERG, B .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1993, 12 (14) :1293-1316
[10]   Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews [J].
Reitsma, JB ;
Glas, AS ;
Rutjes, AWS ;
Scholten, RJPM ;
Bossuyt, PM ;
Zwinderman, AH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (10) :982-990