The labour market in a Keynesian economic regime: theoretical debate and empirical findings

被引:9
作者
Herr, Hansjoerg [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci, Berlin Sch Econ, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Institutions; Keynesian; Wages; Employment; Policy coordination; E02; E12; E24; E61;
D O I
10.1093/cje/ben044
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In a Keynesian mode of thinking wages become the nominal anchor for the price level because unit-labour costs in a closed economy represent the most important factor in determining the price level. The second most important driver of price level changes is the exchange rate. A positive economic regime includes nominal wage increases according to trend productivity growth as well as the target inflation rate of the central bank, discretionary monetary policy geared towards growth and anti-cyclical fiscal policy. Since the early 1990s nominal wages in the USA and the UK have followed this wage norm to a large extent. But in Germany, wages have increased below this norm or even decreased, and in Japan this effect has been even more extreme. Overall, while Japan and Germany have suffered from dysfunctional economic regimes leading to low growth, the UK and USA have managed a much more positive interaction between wage development, monetary policy and fiscal policy.
引用
收藏
页码:949 / 965
页数:17
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], JAPANS POLICY TRAP D
  • [2] [Anonymous], EUROPEAN INTEGRATION
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, WIRTSCHAFTSPOLITISCH
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2002, PSL Q REV, DOI DOI 10.13133/2037-3643/9913
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2012, World Development Indicators
  • [6] The NAIRU in theory and practice
    Ball, L
    Mankiw, NG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2002, 16 (04) : 115 - 136
  • [7] Wage stickiness and aggregate supply in the great depression
    Bernanke, BS
    Carey, K
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1996, 111 (03) : 853 - 883
  • [8] Bispinck R., 2006, MINIMUM WAGES EUROPE, P333
  • [9] BLINDER A.S., 2001, The Fabulous Decade: Macroeconomic lessons from the 1990s
  • [10] BOSCH CJ, 2006, GESETZLICHE MINDESTL