Measurement of Common Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness in Clinical Practice: Comparison of B-Mode and RF-Based Technique

被引:28
作者
Schreuder, F. H. [1 ]
Graf, M. [2 ]
Hameleers, J. M. [2 ]
Mess, W. H. [1 ]
Hoeks, A. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Biophys, Cardiovasc Res Inst Maastricht, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN | 2009年 / 30卷 / 05期
关键词
intima-media thickness; carotid artery; B-mode ultrasonography; radiofrequency; REPRODUCIBILITY; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; DISTENSIBILITY; METAANALYSIS; ROTTERDAM; STIFFNESS; DISEASE; RISK;
D O I
10.1055/s-0028-1109187
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Purpose: The common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CCA-IMT) is usually measured using B-mode ultrasound images. A different approach for CCA-IMT detection is based on radio frequency (RF) multiple M-line analysis. Materials and Methods: The present study explores the relationship between B-mode and RF measurement of CCA-IMT, as well as the reproducibility of both methods in 136 patients recently diagnosed with cardiovascular disease. Within one session, repeated measurements were made in the distal CCA bilaterally, using the B-mode (averaged over 10 mm) and RF technique (avers aging 12 Wines over 14 mm). Results: The two methods correlate well (Pearson r = 0.765). The CCA-IMT values measured with B-mode and RF were 0.779 +/- 0.196 mm and 0.734 +/- 0.172 mm, respectively. B-mode CCA-IMT is significantly larger than RF CCA-IMT (mean difference of 0.045 mm, SEM 7.8 mu m; t = 5.82; p < 0.001). In the multivariate regression analysis, carotid artery stenosis, inhomogeneous IMT and diabetes mellitus were the main predictors of differences between B-mode and RF CCA-IMT. The intrapatient variation for B-mode and RF-based CCA-IMT is comparable (0.05 +/- 0.04mm and 0.07 +/- 0.05 mm, respectively). Conclusion: CCA-IMT values measured with RF and B-mode have similar reproducibility and exhibit acceptable correlation, but RF CCA-IMT is significantly smaller. The difference between both methods is mainly due to advanced atherosclerosis. Hence, both methods can be used reliably to measure CCA-IMT in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 465
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Statins in stroke prevention and carotid atherosclerosis -: Systematic review and up-to-date meta-analysis [J].
Amarenco, P ;
Labreuche, J ;
Lavallée, P ;
Touboul, PJ .
STROKE, 2004, 35 (12) :2902-2909
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   REPRODUCIBILITY OF CAROTID VESSEL WALL THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS - THE ROTTERDAM STUDY [J].
BOTS, ML ;
MULDER, PGH ;
HOFMAN, A ;
VANES, GA ;
GROBBEE, DE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 47 (08) :921-930
[4]   Increased common carotid intima-media thickness - Adaptive response or a reflection of atherosclerosis? Findings from the Rotterdam study [J].
Bots, ML ;
Hofman, A ;
Grobbee, DE .
STROKE, 1997, 28 (12) :2442-2447
[5]   Carotid intima-media thickness, arterial stiffness and risk of cardiovascular disease: current evidence [J].
Bots, ML ;
Dijk, JM ;
Oren, A ;
Grobbee, DE .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2002, 20 (12) :2317-2325
[6]  
Brands P J, 1999, Eur J Ultrasound, V9, P257, DOI 10.1016/S0929-8266(99)00033-6
[7]   Clinical value of carotid intima-media thickness testing [J].
Devine, Patrick J. ;
Carlson, Daniel W. ;
Taylor, Allen J. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 13 (05) :710-718
[8]  
Deyo R.A., 1991, Controlled clinical trials, V12, p142S, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0197-2456(05)80019-4
[9]   ESTIMATION OF ARTERIAL STIFFNESS, COMPLIANCE, AND DISTENSIBILITY FROM M-MODE ULTRASOUND MEASUREMENTS OF THE COMMON CAROTID-ARTERY [J].
GAMBLE, G ;
ZORN, J ;
SANDERS, G ;
MACMAHON, S ;
SHARPE, N .
STROKE, 1994, 25 (01) :11-16
[10]  
Grant Edward G, 2003, Ultrasound Q, V19, P190, DOI 10.1097/00013644-200312000-00005