Risk Prediction in Patients With Heart Failure A Systematic Review and Analysis

被引:321
|
作者
Rahimi, Kazem [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bennett, Derrick [4 ,5 ]
Conrad, Nathalie [1 ,6 ]
Williams, Timothy M. [1 ]
Basu, Joyee [1 ]
Dwight, Jeremy [3 ]
Woodward, Mark [1 ,7 ]
Patel, Anushka [7 ,8 ]
McMurray, John [9 ]
MacMahon, Stephen [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, George Inst Global Hlth, Oxford OX1 3BD, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Div Cardiovasc Med, Oxford OX1 3BD, England
[3] Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Cardiol, Oxford, England
[4] Univ Oxford, Clin Trial Serv Unit, Oxford OX1 3BD, England
[5] Univ Oxford, Epidemiol Studies Unit, Oxford OX1 3BD, England
[6] IBM Corp, Global Business Serv, Business Analyt & Optimizat, Zurich, Switzerland
[7] George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[8] George Inst Global Hlth, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
[9] Univ Glasgow, BHF Glasgow Cardiovasc Res Ctr, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
death; heart failure; hospitalization; multivariable model; risk prediction; systematic review; AMBULATORY PATIENTS; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; INCREMENTAL VALUE; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; TASK-FORCE; MODELS; SCORE; CARE; ASSOCIATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jchf.2014.04.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES This study sought to review the literature for risk prediction models in patients with heart failure and to identify the most consistently reported independent predictors of risk across models. BACKGROUND Risk assessment provides information about patient prognosis, guides decision making about the type and intensity of care, and enables better understanding of provider performance. METHODS MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from January 1995 to March 2013, followed by hand searches of the retrieved reference lists. Studies were eligible if they reported at least 1 multivariable model for risk prediction of death, hospitalization, or both in patients with heart failure and reported model performance. We ranked reported individual risk predictors by their strength of association with the outcome and assessed the association of model performance with study characteristics. RESULTS Sixty-four main models and 50 modifications from 48 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of the 64 main models, 43 models predicted death, 10 hospitalization, and 11 death or hospitalization. The discriminatory ability of the models for prediction of death appeared to be higher than that for prediction of death or hospitalization or prediction of hospitalization alone (p = 0.0003). A wide variation between studies in clinical settings, population characteristics, sample size, and variables used for model development was observed, but these features were not significantly associated with the discriminatory performance of the models. A few strong predictors emerged for prediction of death; the most consistently reported predictors were age, renal function, blood pressure, blood sodium level, left ventricular ejection fraction, sex, brain natriuretic peptide level, New York Heart Association functional class, diabetes, weight or body mass index, and exercise capacity. CONCLUSIONS There are several clinically useful and well-validated death prediction models in patients with heart failure. Although the studies differed in many respects, the models largely included a few common markers of risk. (C) 2014 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 446
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic review and meta-analysis of frailty in patients with heart failure
    Chen, Xia
    Meng, Xiangying
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2024,
  • [32] Falls in Patients With Heart Failure A Systematic Review
    Lee, Kayoung
    Pressler, Susan J.
    Titler, Marita
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2016, 31 (06) : 555 - 561
  • [33] HIV infection and risk of heart failure: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Li, Xiaofei
    ACTA BIOCHIMICA POLONICA, 2022, : 531 - 535
  • [34] Heart Failure Caregiver Burden and Outcomes: A Systematic Review
    Suksatan, Wanich
    Tankumpuan, Thitipong
    Davidson, Patricia M.
    JOURNAL OF PRIMARY CARE AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2022, 13
  • [35] The different risk of new-onset, chronic, worsening, and advanced heart failure: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis
    Shakoor, Abdul
    Abou Kamar, Sabrina
    Malgie, Jishnu
    Kardys, Isabella
    Schaap, Jeroen
    de Boer, Rudolf A.
    van Mieghem, Nicolas M.
    van der Boon, Robert M. A.
    Brugts, Jasper J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2024, 26 (02) : 216 - 229
  • [36] Survival of patients with chronic heart failure in the community: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
    Jones, Nicholas R.
    Roalfe, Andrea K.
    Adoki, Ibiye
    Hobbs, F. D. Richard
    Taylor, Clare J.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7
  • [37] Prognostic value of anion gap for patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Samavarchitehrani, Amirsaeed
    Norouzi, Mitra
    Khalaji, Amirmohammad
    Ghondaghsaz, Elina
    Behnoush, Amir Hossein
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [38] Effect of Exercise Rehabilitation in Patients With Acute Heart Failure A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Liang, Qian
    Wang, Zhiwei
    Liu, Jian
    Yan, Zeping
    Liu, Jing
    Lei, Meirong
    Zhang, Hongwei
    Luan, Xiaorong
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2024, 39 (04) : 390 - 400
  • [39] Proteomics for heart failure risk stratification: a systematic review
    Kuku, Kayode O.
    Oyetoro, Rebecca
    Hashemian, Maryam
    Livinski, Alicia A.
    Shearer, Joseph J.
    Joo, Jungnam
    Psaty, Bruce M.
    Levy, Daniel
    Ganz, Peter
    Roger, Veronique L.
    BMC MEDICINE, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [40] Coronary heart disease, heart failure, and the risk of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wolters, Frank J.
    Segufa, Reffat A.
    Darweesh, Sirwan K. L.
    Bos, Daniel
    Ikram, Mohammad Arfan
    Sabayan, Behnam
    Hofman, Albert
    Sedaghat, Sanaz
    ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2018, 14 (11) : 1493 - 1504