An interactive risk visualisation tool for large-scale and complex engineering and construction projects under uncertainty and interdependence

被引:31
作者
Kimiagari, Salman [1 ]
Keivanpour, Samira [2 ]
机构
[1] Thompson Rivers Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Mkt & Int Business, Kamloops, BC, Canada
[2] Thompson Rivers Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Management Informat & Supply Chain, Kamloops, BC, Canada
关键词
risk analysis; interactive risk visualisation; large-scale engineering and construction projects; uncertainty; fuzzy group decision-making; analytic network process; ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; DECISION-MAKING; FUZZY-AHP; SERVICE CONTRACTS; HIERARCHY PROCESS; SELECTION; OIL; MANAGEMENT; MULTICRITERIA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2018.1503426
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Implementation of the megaprojects with large-scale engineering and construction projects are risky in nature and evaluating the associated risks of those large projects is a critical success factor. The systematic approaches and empirical studies related to the visualisation and communicating risks of these projects remain missing. This paper aims to develop a systematic approach to managing and visualising the risk of these mega-projects using joint application of fuzzy group decision-making, analytic network process and mapping the resulting network of dependencies together with proximity information, graph theory, and mutual information theory. We have applied the model in a real case study of megaprojects in the oil and gas industry. The methodology proposed in this study could be used in the other large-scale engineering and construction projects considering the contracts features and the contextual factors.
引用
收藏
页码:6827 / 6855
页数:29
相关论文
共 85 条
[21]  
Clayton M. J., 1997, Educational Psychology, V17, P373, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170401, DOI 10.1080/0144341970170401, 10.1080/0144341970170401]
[22]   A fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) model to identify faulty behavior risk (FBR) in work system [J].
Dagdeviren, Metin ;
Yueksel, Ihsan ;
Kurt, Mustafa .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2008, 46 (05) :771-783
[23]  
Deeley K., 2016, EXPLORING RISK CONTA
[24]   Project risk management using multiple criteria decision-making technique and decision tree analysis: a case study of Indian oil refinery [J].
Dey, Prasanta Kumar .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2012, 23 (12) :903-921
[25]   Managing project risk using combined analytic hierarchy process and risk map [J].
Dey, Prasanta Kumar .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2010, 10 (04) :990-1000
[26]  
Ding S., 2018, TIME AWARE CLOUD SER
[27]   Utilizing customer satisfaction in ranking prediction for personalized cloud service selection [J].
Ding, Shuai ;
Wang, Zeyuan ;
Wu, Desheng ;
Olson, David L. .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2017, 93 :1-10
[28]   Combining QoS prediction and customer satisfaction estimation to solve cloud service trustworthiness evaluation problems [J].
Ding, Shuai ;
Yang, Shanlin ;
Zhang, Youtao ;
Liang, Changyong ;
Xia, Chenyi .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2014, 56 :216-225
[29]   A systematic framework for risk visualization in risk management and communication [J].
Eppler, Martin J. ;
Aeschimann, Markus .
RISK MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2009, 11 (02) :67-89
[30]   On oil investment and production: A comparison of production sharing contracts and buyback contracts [J].
Feng, Zhuo ;
Zhang, Shui-Bo ;
Gao, Ying .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2014, 42 :395-402