An interactive risk visualisation tool for large-scale and complex engineering and construction projects under uncertainty and interdependence

被引:26
作者
Kimiagari, Salman [1 ]
Keivanpour, Samira [2 ]
机构
[1] Thompson Rivers Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Mkt & Int Business, Kamloops, BC, Canada
[2] Thompson Rivers Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Management Informat & Supply Chain, Kamloops, BC, Canada
关键词
risk analysis; interactive risk visualisation; large-scale engineering and construction projects; uncertainty; fuzzy group decision-making; analytic network process; ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; DECISION-MAKING; FUZZY-AHP; SERVICE CONTRACTS; HIERARCHY PROCESS; SELECTION; OIL; MANAGEMENT; MULTICRITERIA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2018.1503426
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Implementation of the megaprojects with large-scale engineering and construction projects are risky in nature and evaluating the associated risks of those large projects is a critical success factor. The systematic approaches and empirical studies related to the visualisation and communicating risks of these projects remain missing. This paper aims to develop a systematic approach to managing and visualising the risk of these mega-projects using joint application of fuzzy group decision-making, analytic network process and mapping the resulting network of dependencies together with proximity information, graph theory, and mutual information theory. We have applied the model in a real case study of megaprojects in the oil and gas industry. The methodology proposed in this study could be used in the other large-scale engineering and construction projects considering the contracts features and the contextual factors.
引用
收藏
页码:6827 / 6855
页数:29
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [21] Clayton M. J., 1997, Educational Psychology, V17, P373, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170401, DOI 10.1080/0144341970170401, 10.1080/0144341970170401]
  • [22] A fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) model to identify faulty behavior risk (FBR) in work system
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    Yueksel, Ihsan
    Kurt, Mustafa
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2008, 46 (05) : 771 - 783
  • [23] Deeley K., 2016, EXPLORING RISK CONTA
  • [24] Project risk management using multiple criteria decision-making technique and decision tree analysis: a case study of Indian oil refinery
    Dey, Prasanta Kumar
    [J]. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2012, 23 (12) : 903 - 921
  • [25] Managing project risk using combined analytic hierarchy process and risk map
    Dey, Prasanta Kumar
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2010, 10 (04) : 990 - 1000
  • [26] Ding S., 2018, TIME AWARE CLOUD SER
  • [27] Utilizing customer satisfaction in ranking prediction for personalized cloud service selection
    Ding, Shuai
    Wang, Zeyuan
    Wu, Desheng
    Olson, David L.
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2017, 93 : 1 - 10
  • [28] Combining QoS prediction and customer satisfaction estimation to solve cloud service trustworthiness evaluation problems
    Ding, Shuai
    Yang, Shanlin
    Zhang, Youtao
    Liang, Changyong
    Xia, Chenyi
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2014, 56 : 216 - 225
  • [29] A systematic framework for risk visualization in risk management and communication
    Eppler, Martin J.
    Aeschimann, Markus
    [J]. RISK MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2009, 11 (02): : 67 - 89
  • [30] On oil investment and production: A comparison of production sharing contracts and buyback contracts
    Feng, Zhuo
    Zhang, Shui-Bo
    Gao, Ying
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2014, 42 : 395 - 402