Biotechnology in Switzerland - Frames in a heated debate

被引:15
作者
Dahinden, U [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Inst Mass Commun & Media Res, CH-8035 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1177/107554702237844
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The public debate over biotechnology has been especially intense in Switzerland. The frame theory is introduced as a promising approach for better understanding this controversy. One shortcoming of current frame research is the diversity of frame typologies. An attempt to compare and integrate several frame typologies is presented. The theoretical analysis suggests that most of the frames are not issue specific but of a more general nature. The empirical section presents the framing of biotechnology over the past thirty years, during which increasing conflicts paralleled a higher diversity of frames in the media.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 197
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, FRAMING PUBLIC LIFE
  • [2] [Anonymous], RUNDFUNK FERNSEHEN
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1996, The Psychology of Political Communication
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2001, BIOTECHNOLOGY 1996 2
  • [5] BONFADELLI H, 2001, BIOTECHNOLOGY 1996 2, P282
  • [6] BRAUN R, 1998, 8 EUR FED BIOT TASK
  • [7] Disrupting the media frame at Greenham Common: a new chapter in the history of mediations?
    Couldry, N
    [J]. MEDIA CULTURE & SOCIETY, 1999, 21 (03) : 337 - +
  • [8] Dunwoody S, 1992, SOCIAL RESPONSE ENV, P75, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-2954-1
  • [9] Durant J., 1998, BIOTECHNOLOGY PUBLIC
  • [10] Durant John., 1999, Science and Public Policy, V26, P313, DOI [10.3152/147154399781782329, DOI 10.3152/147154399781782329]