What does the French public think about inclusive education?

被引:4
作者
Jury, Mickael [1 ]
Khamzina, Kamilla [1 ]
Perrin, Anne-Laure [2 ]
Serour, Natacha [1 ]
Guichardaz, Emmanuel [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Clermont Auvergne, ACTe, Clermont Ferrand, France
[2] Univ Lille, ULR PSITEC Psychol Interact Temps Emot Cognit 407, Lille, France
[3] Trisomie 21 France, St Etienne, France
关键词
Public attitudes; disability; Down syndrome; autism; inclusive education;
D O I
10.3109/13668250.2020.1863773
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Background To explain that students with intellectual disabilities are not fully included in mainstream education, the present paper investigates public attitudes towards inclusive education and notably examines how these vary according to students' type of disability (i.e., an intellectual, a communicational, a sensory, a motor, or a specific learning one). Method Data were extracted from an opinion poll on inclusive education conducted on a representative sample of the French population (N = 1001). Results The analyses indicated that the public are less favourably inclined towards the inclusion of students with an intellectual disability in comparison to students with autism spectrum disorder, a sensory disability, specific learning disabilities or a motor disability. Participants who are familiar with disability seem to express more favourable attitudes than those who are not. Conclusions The present study contributes to a better understanding of public attitudes towards inclusive education and opens perspectives to develop more inclusive societies.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 369
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Avramidis E., 2000, Educational Psychology, V20, P191, DOI [10.1080/713663717, DOI 10.1080/713663717]
  • [2] Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
    Bates, Douglas
    Maechler, Martin
    Bolker, Benjamin M.
    Walker, Steven C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01): : 1 - 48
  • [3] Brackenreed D., 2008, Exceptionality Education Canada, V18, P131, DOI [10.5206/eei.v18i3.7630, DOI 10.5206/EEI.V18I3.7630]
  • [4] Burge P, 2008, CAN J EDUC ADM POLIC, P1
  • [5] Burge P, 2007, J VOCAT REHABIL, V26, P29
  • [6] Cameron DL, 2013, EDUC TRAIN AUTISM DE, V48, P18
  • [7] The structure of arguments used to support or oppose inclusion policies for students with disabilities
    Cole, Peter G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY, 1999, 24 (03) : 215 - 225
  • [8] Who opposes rights for persons with physical and intellectual disabilities?
    Crowson, H. Michael
    Brandes, Joyce A.
    Hurst, Rebecca J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 43 : E307 - E318
  • [9] Dachez J., 2016, CAHIERS INT PSYCHOL, V112, P477, DOI DOI 10.3917/CIPS.112.0477
  • [10] De Boer A., 2010, European Journal of Special Needs, V25, P165, DOI DOI 10.1080/08856251003658694