Infanticide by subordinates influences reproductive sharing in cooperatively breeding meerkats

被引:64
作者
Young, Andrew J. [1 ]
Clutton-Brock, Tim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
reproductive skew; cooperative breeding; subordinate control;
D O I
10.1098/rsbl.2006.0463
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In cooperative animal societies, dominant females typically show higher breeding success than subordinates, and are commonly believed to control the extent of reproductive sharing. However, studies of social insect societies reveal that subordinates too can interfere with the breeding attempts of others, with important implications for the distribution of fitness within colonies. Here, we show that subordinate females in a high-skew vertebrate (the meerkat, Suricata suricatta), also exert a substantial influence over the reproductive attempts of others. In meerkat societies, pregnant dominants are known to kill subordinate fitters, but we show that pregnant subordinates also kill pups; not only those of other subordinates but the dominant's as well. Litters born to females of any rank were half as likely to survive their first 4 days if a subordinate was pregnant. However, dominant females were more likely than subordinates to give birth when no other females were pregnant, and so lost fewer litters to infanticide than subordinates. This is probably due in part to dominants employing counter-tactics to reduce the incidence of subordinate pregnancy. We discuss the broad implications of subordinates having a degree of control over reproductive sharing for future attempts to understand the distribution of reproduction in animal societies.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 387
页数:3
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Bourke A. F. G., 1995, MONOGRAPHS BEHAV ECO
[2]   Infanticide and expulsion of females in a cooperative mammal [J].
Clutton-Brock, TH ;
Brotherton, PNM ;
Smith, R ;
McIlrath, GM ;
Kansky, R ;
Gaynor, D ;
O'Riain, MJ ;
Skinner, JD .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1998, 265 (1412) :2291-2295
[3]   Cooperation, control, and concession in meerkat groups [J].
Clutton-Brock, TH ;
Brotherton, PNM ;
Russell, AF ;
O'Riain, MJ ;
Gaynor, D ;
Kansky, R ;
Griffin, A ;
Manser, M ;
Sharpe, L ;
McIlrath, GM ;
Small, T ;
Moss, A ;
Monfort, S .
SCIENCE, 2001, 291 (5503) :478-481
[4]  
Hoogland JL., 1995, The black-tailed prairie dog: social life of a burrowing mammal
[5]   PARTITIONING OF REPRODUCTION IN ANIMAL SOCIETIES [J].
KELLER, L ;
REEVE, HK .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1994, 9 (03) :98-102
[6]  
Magrath Robert D., 2004, P157, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511606816.011
[7]   REPRODUCTIVE COMPETITION IN THE COMMUNAL ACORN WOODPECKER - SISTERS DESTROY EACH OTHERS EGGS [J].
MUMME, RL ;
KOENIG, WD ;
PITELKA, FA .
NATURE, 1983, 306 (5943) :583-584
[8]   From individual control to majority rule: extending transactional models of reproductive skew in animal societies [J].
Reeve, HK ;
Jeanne, RL .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 270 (1519) :1041-1045
[9]   Reproductive bribing and policing evolutionary mechanisms for the suppression of within-group selfishness [J].
Reeve, HK ;
Keller, L .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1997, 150 :S42-S58
[10]   THE LOGIC OF ASYMMETRIC CONTESTS [J].
SMITH, JM ;
PARKER, GA .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1976, 24 (FEB) :159-175