The efficacy of quantitative fluorescent-polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) in the diagnosis of prenatal aneuploidy

被引:1
作者
Aydogmus, Serpil [1 ]
Keskin, Hueseyin Levent [1 ]
Gokce, Semra Baykal [2 ]
Avsar, Ayse Filiz [1 ]
Celen, Emine [1 ]
机构
[1] Ataturk Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ataturk Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Biochem & Clin Biochem, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Aneuploidy; QF-PCR conventional karyotype analysis; CHROMOSOME-SPECIFIC PROBES; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; FISH; LIMITATIONS;
D O I
10.3906/sag-0802-20
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: To investigate the efficacy of quantitative fluorescent-polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) in the diagnosis of aneuploidy. Materials and methods: The study included 40 pregnant women considered to be at high risk, based on positive trisomy 21 screening results, that underwent amniocentesis for karyotyping to detect chromosomal anomalies. In amniotic fluid aneuploidy detection was carried out by both standard karyotyping and the QF-PCR method, and the results obtained with both methods were compared. In order to determine the efficacy of QF-PCR, its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Results: Of the 40 patients' results obtained with the 2 methods, 32 were similar. In 31 of these 32 cases, chromosome analysis interpreted as normal by QF-PCR was also established to be normal by standard karyotype analysis and 1 case evaluated as trisomy by QF-PCR was also determined to be trisomy 21 by standard karyotype analysis. In 6 cases, however, results were evaluated as chromosomal abnormality by QF-PCR, whereas standard analysis found them to be normal. The efficacy indices of QF-PCR were as follows: sensitivity 50%, specificity 83.7%, PPV 14.3%, and NPV 96.9%. Conclusion: Until the efficacy of QF-PCR increases, along with the sophistication of the technique, conventional karyotype analysis will remain the gold standard.
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 746
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Prenatal detection of Down's syndrome by rapid aneuploidy testing for chromosomes 13,18, and 21 by FISH or PCR without a full karyotype: a cytogenetic risk assessment
    Caine, A
    Maltby, AE
    Parkin, CA
    Waters, JJ
    Crolla, JA
    [J]. LANCET, 2005, 366 (9480) : 123 - 128
  • [2] Rapid prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies by QF-PCR.: Assessment on 18,000 consecutive clinical samples
    Cirigliano, V
    Voglino, G
    Cañadas, MP
    Marongiu, A
    Ejarque, M
    Ordoñez, E
    Plaja, A
    Massobrio, M
    Todros, T
    Fuster, C
    Campogrande, M
    Egozcue, J
    Adinolfi, M
    [J]. MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2004, 10 (11) : 839 - 846
  • [3] FLUORESCENT IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION UTILIZATION FOR HIGH-RISK PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS - A TRADE-OFF AMONG SPEED, EXPENSE, AND INHERENT LIMITATIONS OF CHROMOSOME-SPECIFIC PROBES
    EVANS, MI
    EBRAHIM, SAD
    BERRY, SM
    HOLZGREVE, W
    ISADA, NB
    QUINTERO, RA
    JOHNSON, MP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 171 (04) : 1055 - 1057
  • [4] International, collaborative assessment of 146 000 prenatal karyotypes: expected limitations if only chromosome-specific probes and fluorescent in-situ hybridization are used
    Evans, MI
    Henry, GP
    Miller, WA
    Bui, TH
    Snidjers, RJ
    Wapner, RJ
    Miny, P
    Johnson, MP
    Peakman, D
    Johnson, A
    Nicolaides, K
    Holzgreve, W
    Ebrahim, SAD
    Babu, R
    Jackson, L
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (05) : 1213 - 1216
  • [5] Rapid detection of chromosomal aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA)
    Hochstenbach, R
    Meijer, J
    van de Brug, J
    Vossebeld-Hoff, I
    Jansen, R
    van der Luijt, RB
    Sinke, RJ
    Page-Christiaens, GCML
    van Amstel, JKP
    de Pater, JM
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2005, 25 (11) : 1032 - 1039
  • [6] Rapid and simple prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome disorders:: advantages and disadvantages of the molecular methods FISH and QF-PCR
    Hultén, MA
    Dhanjal, S
    Pertl, B
    [J]. REPRODUCTION, 2003, 126 (03) : 279 - 297
  • [7] Development and implementation of a new rapid aneuploidy diagnostic service within the UK National Health Service and implications for the future of prenatal diagnosis
    Mann, K
    Fox, SP
    Abbs, SJ
    Yau, SC
    Scriven, PN
    Docherty, Z
    Ogilvie, CM
    [J]. LANCET, 2001, 358 (9287) : 1057 - 1061
  • [8] The introduction of QF-PCR in prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies: time for reconsideration
    Nicolini, U
    Lalatta, F
    Natacci, F
    Curcio, C
    Bui, TH
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2004, 10 (06) : 541 - 548
  • [9] Rapid prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidy using quantitative fluorescence-PCR (QF-PCR)
    Ogilvie, CM
    Donaghue, C
    Fox, SP
    Docherty, Z
    Mann, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 2005, 53 (03) : 285 - 288
  • [10] Thein ATA, 2000, PRENATAL DIAG, V20, P275, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(200004)20:4<275::AID-PD799>3.0.CO