The effect of emergency department delay on outcome in critically ill medical patients:: evaluation using hospital mortality and quality of life at 6 months

被引:48
作者
Saukkonen, K. A.
Varpula, M.
Rasanen, P.
Roine, R. P.
Voipio-Pulkki, L. -M.
Pettila, V.
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Med, Helsinki 00100, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Div Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med,Dept Surg, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Grp Adm, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Uusimaa Hosp Dist, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
critical illness; hospital mortality; intensive care units; length of stay; quality of life;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01716.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To assess the impact of delay in emergency department (ED) on outcome of critically ill patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit (MICU). Outcome was defined as hospital mortality and as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 6 months after intensive care assessed by the 15D measure. The 15D is a generic, 15-dimensional, standardized measure of HRQoL. We hypothesized that prolonged stay in the ED is related to worse outcome. Design and setting. A prospective follow-up cohort study in university hospital. Subjects. All consecutive 1675 patients admitted to the MICU between July 2002 and June 2004. Results. The 15D questionnaire was mailed to all patients alive at 6 months after admission. Of all MICU patients, 64% were admitted from ED. The mean length of stay in the ED was 6.2 h (95%CI 5.9-6.5 h). The hospital mortality rate was 24.4% (20.0% in the ED vs. 33.0% in the non-ED cohort, P < 0.001) and it was associated with higher age and degree of physiological derangement at admission. Neither the length of ED stay was associated with hospital mortality (P = 0.82) nor with HRQoL at 6 months after MICU admission (P = 0.34). Altogether, HRQoL at 6 months was significantly lower compared with the age- and sex-matched general population (P < 0.001). Conclusions. In a university hospital, the length of ED stay was not associated with the outcome of critically ill medical patients. However, we feel that the effect of ED treatment and delay on outcome and outcome prediction in the critically ill patients deserves further evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:586 / 591
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Surviving intensive care: a report from the 2002 Brussels Roundtable [J].
Angus, DC ;
Carlet, J .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 29 (03) :368-377
[2]  
Aromaa A, 2004, PUBLICHATIONS NATL B, V12, P171
[3]   Review of outcome measures used in adult critical care [J].
Black, NA ;
Jenkinson, C ;
Hayes, JA ;
Young, D ;
Vella, K ;
Rowan, KM ;
Daly, K ;
Ridley, S .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (11) :2119-2124
[4]   EuroQol: The current state of play [J].
Brooks, R .
HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) :53-72
[5]   Quality of life in adult survivors of critical illness: A systematic review of the literature [J].
Dowdy, DW ;
Eid, MP ;
Sedrakyan, A ;
Mendez-Tellez, PA ;
Pronovost, PJ ;
Herridge, MS ;
Needham, DM .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 31 (05) :611-620
[6]   The longer patients are in hospital before Intensive Care admission the higher their mortality [J].
Goldhill, DR ;
McNarry, AF ;
Hadjianastassiou, VG ;
Tekkis, PP .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 30 (10) :1908-1913
[7]   Evidence-based management of critically ill patients: Analysis and implementation [J].
Gropper, MA .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 99 (02) :566-572
[8]   A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments [J].
Hawthorne, G ;
Richardson, J ;
Day, NA .
ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2001, 33 (05) :358-370
[9]   Performance of two measures of general health-related quality of life, the EQ-5D and the RAND-36 among critically ill patients [J].
Kaarlola, A ;
Pettilä, V ;
Kekki, P .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 30 (12) :2245-2252
[10]  
Park HK, 2002, MOL CELLS, V14, P50