Exploring the Assessment of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders With the Personality Assessment Inventory

被引:20
作者
Busch, Alexander J. [1 ]
Morey, Leslie C. [1 ]
Hopwood, Christopher J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Psychol, 282 Psychol Bldg, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Psychol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
TRAIT MODEL; ASSESSING LEVEL; 5-FACTOR MODEL; SEVERITY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1080/00223891.2016.1217872
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Section III of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed. [DSM-5]; American Psychiatric Association, 2013) contains an alternative model for the diagnosis of personality disorder involving the assessment of 25 traits and a global level of overall personality functioning. There is hope that this model will be increasingly used in clinical and research settings, and the ability to apply established instruments to assess these concepts could facilitate this process. This study sought to develop scoring algorithms for these alternative model concepts using scales from the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). A multiple regression strategy used to predict scores in 2 undergraduate samples on DSM-5 alternative model instruments: the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) and the General Personality Pathology scale (GPP; Morey etal., 2011). These regression functions resulted in scores that demonstrated promising convergent and discriminant validity across the alternative model concepts, as well as a factor structure in a cross-validation sample that was congruent with the putative structure of the alternative model traits. Results were linked to the PAI community normative data to provide normative information regarding these alternative model concepts that can be used to identify elevated traits and personality functioning level scores.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 218
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ANN M SOC PERS ASS B
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1985, Applied Linear Regression, DOI DOI 10.1002/BIMJ.4710300746
[3]   A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists [J].
Archer, Robert P. ;
Buffington-Vollum, Jacqueline K. ;
Stredny, Rebecca Vauter ;
Handel, Richard W. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2006, 87 (01) :84-94
[4]   Toward a Model for Assessing Level of Personality Functioning in DSM-5, Part I: A Review of Theory and Methods [J].
Bender, Donna S. ;
Morey, Leslie C. ;
Skodol, Andrew E. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2011, 93 (04) :332-346
[5]  
Carter MJ, 2014, THER RECREAT J, V48, P275
[6]   Personality disorder assessment: The challenge of construct validity [J].
Clark, LA ;
Livesley, WJ ;
Morey, LC .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 1997, 11 (03) :205-231
[7]   THINGS I HAVE LEARNED (SO FAR) [J].
COHEN, J .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1990, 45 (12) :1304-1312
[8]   The Discriminant (and Convergent) Validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 [J].
Crego, Cristina ;
Gore, Whitney L. ;
Rojas, Stephanie L. ;
Widiger, Thomas A. .
PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 6 (04) :321-335
[9]   CONSTRUCT VALIDITY IN PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS [J].
CRONBACH, LJ ;
MEEHL, PE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1955, 52 (04) :281-302
[10]   The DSM-5 Dimensional Trait Model and Five-Factor Models of General Personality [J].
Gore, Whitney L. ;
Widiger, Thomas A. .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 122 (03) :816-821