Integrated LCA-LEED sustainability assessment model for structure and envelope systems of school buildings

被引:75
作者
Alshamrani, Othman Subhi [1 ]
Gala, Khaled [2 ]
Alkass, Sabah [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dammam, Coll Architecture & Planning, Dept Bldg Engn, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
[2] Concordia Univ, Dept Bldg Civil & Environm Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Sharjah, Coll Engn, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Sustainability assessment; Structure and envelope; Integrated LCA-LEED model; LEED score; Energy consumption; Global warming potential; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; CONSTRUCTION; CONCRETE; DESIGN; STEEL; HOUSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.05.021
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In Canada and USA, nearly 80 million students and teachers spend at least eight hours daily in schools that could be unhealthy and restrict their ability to learn. Despite this fact there is lack of adopting sustainability principles in school buildings. Even though life cycle assessment (LCA) and LEED (R) could serve as sustainability measurement tools, studies show that the integration of sustainability principles to LCA has not become standard practice yet. This paper presents an integrated LCA-LEED model that incorporates LCA into LEED and assigns corresponding LEED scores to achieve a high level of sustainability assessment, for the structure and envelope systems of Canadian school buildings. In this model, the selection of the most sustainable structure and envelope type for school buildings is done through the evaluation of three categories of the LEED rating system: energy and atmosphere, materials and resources, and LCA (incorporated under the innovation and design process category of LEED). Various options are tested by considering structures such as concrete, steel, masonry and wood, and envelope types such as precast panels, steel stud, wood stud and cavity wall. Energy simulation is performed by eQUEST (R) (version 3.64) program and LCA is performed by ATHENA (R) impact estimator. The results show that concrete and masonry buildings have high energy consumption and global warming potential during certain life cycle stages such as manufacturing, construction and demolition. However they have lower annual energy consumption and environmental impact during the operating stage, as well as for the overall life span. Concrete building with minimum insulation has obtained the highest total LEED score (19) followed by masonry (17), while steel and steel-masonry buildings have the least score (14). (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 70
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries - Case of Jordan
    Ali, Hikmat H.
    Al Nsairat, Saba F.
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 44 (05) : 1053 - 1064
  • [2] Developing sustainable building assessment scheme for Saudi Arabia: Delphi consultation approach
    Alyami, Saleh. H.
    Rezgui, Yacine
    Kwan, Alan
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 27 : 43 - 54
  • [3] Sustainable building assessment tool development approach
    Alyami, Saleh H.
    Rezgui, Yacine
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2012, 5 : 52 - 62
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2006, GREENING AM SCH COST
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2006, INT EN CONS COD TABL, P30
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2007, 9011999 ANSIASHRAEIE, P177
  • [7] Athena Sustainable Materials Institute, 2011, ATHENA IMP EST BUILD
  • [8] Attalla M., 2009, 2 INT 8 CONSTR SPEC
  • [9] Application of life-cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts
    Basbagill, J.
    Flager, F.
    Lepech, M.
    Fischer, M.
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 60 : 81 - 92
  • [10] Boeri A., 2013, International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, V8, P140, DOI [10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81534-0, DOI 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81534-0, DOI 10.2495/SDP-V8-N2-140-157]