A framework for complexity in palliative care: A qualitative study with patients, family carers and professionals

被引:88
作者
Pask, Sophie [1 ]
Pinto, Cathryn [1 ]
Bristowe, Katherine [1 ]
van Vliet, Liesbeth [1 ]
Nicholson, Caroline [2 ]
Evans, Catherine J. [1 ,3 ]
George, Rob [4 ]
Bailey, Katharine [1 ]
Davies, Joanna M. [1 ]
Guo, Ping [1 ]
Daveson, Barbara A. [1 ]
Higginson, Irene J. [1 ]
Murtagh, Fliss E. M. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Cicely Saunders Inst Palliat Care Policy & Rehabi, London SE5 9PJ, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Florence Nightingale Fac Nursing Midwifery & Pall, London, England
[3] Sussex Community NHS Fdn Trust, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[4] St Christophers Hosp, London, England
[5] Univ Hull, Hull York Med Sch, Wolfson Palliat Care Res Ctr, Kingston Upon Hull, N Humberside, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Complexity; palliative care; human development; classification; qualitative research; CANCER-PATIENTS; MEDICAL COMPLEXITY; MODEL; CASEMIX; LIFE; COMORBIDITY; PERSPECTIVE; CRITERIA; LESSONS; DOCTORS;
D O I
10.1177/0269216318757622
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Palliative care patients are often described as complex but evidence on complexity is limited. We need to understand complexity, including at individual patient-level, to define specialist palliative care, characterise palliative care populations and meaningfully compare interventions/outcomes. Aim: To explore palliative care stakeholders' views on what makes a patient more or less complex and insights on capturing complexity at patient-level. Design: In-depth qualitative interviews, analysed using Framework analysis. Participants/setting: Semi-structured interviews across six UK centres with patients, family, professionals, managers and senior leads, purposively sampled by experience, background, location and setting (hospital, hospice and community). Results: 65 participants provided an understanding of complexity, which extended far beyond the commonly used physical, psychological, social and spiritual domains. Complexity included how patients interact with family/professionals, how services' respond to needs and societal perspectives on care. Pre-existing', cumulative' and invisible' complexity are further important dimensions to delivering effective palliative and end-of-life care. The dynamic nature of illness and needs over time was also profoundly influential. Adapting Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory, we categorised findings into the microsystem (person, needs and characteristics), chronosystem (dynamic influences of time), mesosystem (interactions with family/health professionals), exosystem (palliative care services/systems) and macrosystem (societal influences). Stakeholders found it acceptable to capture complexity at the patient-level, with perceived benefits for improving palliative care resource allocation. Conclusion: Our conceptual framework encompasses additional elements beyond physical, psychological, social and spiritual domains and advances systematic understanding of complexity within the context of palliative care. This framework helps capture patient-level complexity and target resource provision in specialist palliative care.
引用
收藏
页码:1078 / 1090
页数:13
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Research sensitivities to palliative care patients [J].
Addington-Hall, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2002, 11 (03) :220-224
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, End of Life Care
[3]  
[Anonymous], GLOB BURD DIS 2004 U
[4]  
[Anonymous], FRAM APPR QUAL DAT A
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Dynamic social network modeling and analysis: Workshop summary and papers
[6]   Mapping hospice patients' perception and verbal communication of end-of-life needs: an exploratory mixed methods inquiry [J].
Arnold, Bruce L. .
BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2011, 10
[7]  
Averill R.F., 1998, EVOLUTION CASEMIX ME
[8]  
Bestall Janine C, 2004, Int J Palliat Nurs, V10, P381
[9]  
Bronfenbrenner U., 1993, International Encyclopedia of Education, V3, P37
[10]  
Cancer Action Team, 2007, HOL COMM ASS SUPP PA