Implementation of waste-to-energy options in landfill-dominated countries: Economic evaluation and GHG impact

被引:44
作者
Aracil, Cristina [1 ]
Haro, Pedro [1 ]
Fuentes-Cano, Diego [1 ]
Gomez-Barea, Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seville, Escuela Tecn Super Ingn, Bioenergy Grp, Chem & Environm Engn Dept, Camino Descubrimientos S-N, Seville 41092, Spain
关键词
MSW refuse; RDF; Gate fee; Waste gasification; Incineration; LCA; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; RDF PRODUCTION PLANTS; BED GASIFICATION; TECHNOLOGIES; PERFORMANCES; SPAIN; INCINERATION; PERSPECTIVE; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.039
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The economic and environmental impact of several waste-to-energy (WtE) schemes to produce electricity from municipal solid waste (MSW) refuse is evaluated and compared with landfill disposal. Both incineration and gasification alternatives are considered. The gasification option includes three different configurations: (1) a fluidized bed gasifier (FBG) with internal combustion engine (ICE), (2) a FBG with organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and (3) a grate gasifier with steam Rankine cycle (SRC). The study is primarily applied to regions where the management system is based on Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT) plants, generating a large share of refuse (>70%), which is currently landfilled. The specific case of Andalusia, a region in the south of Spain with 23 MBT plants distributed over a region of 87.000 km(2), where about 80% of municipal solid waste (MSW) is currently landfilled, is taken as main reference; thereafter, the study is further extended to preliminary assess other regions of some European landfill dominated countries with similar characteristics. The results show that both incineration and gasification improve landfill disposal, contributing favorably to greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction and fulfilling EU environmental regulations, although the three gasification options analyzed yield lower GHG emissions than incineration. In addition, gasification enables better integration of WtE into existing MBT plants, especially in the particular case of Andalusia, where MBT plants are widespread on the region, making it a more promising option than incineration, which is mainly based on large centralized plants, and less socially accepted. From the options analyzed, the WtE scheme based on FBG with ICE gives the highest profitability for a given gate fee, due to much higher electrical efficiency. However, FBG with ORC seems to be a better option in the short-term for landfill-dominated countries, due to its higher technical reliability and the low gate fee currently available in these countries. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 456
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] AER-Authority Emilia Romagna, 2010, AN PREZZ MED IMP
  • [2] [Anonymous], ENERGY, V2
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, STAT FRAM PLAN WAST
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, 27215 EUR EN EUR COM
  • [5] [Anonymous], 26720 EUR EN EUR COM
  • [6] [Anonymous], FRAM ASS BIOG CO2 EM
  • [7] [Anonymous], 153572012 EN
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2013, EEA REPORTS
  • [9] Proving the climate benefit in the production of biofuels from municipal solid waste refuse in Europe
    Aracil, C.
    Haro, P.
    Giuntoli, J.
    Ollero, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 142 : 2887 - 2900
  • [10] A techno-economic evaluation of a small-scale fluidized bed gasifier for solid recovered fuel
    Arena, Umberto
    Di Gregorio, Fabrizio
    De Troia, Gianfranco
    Saponaro, Alessandro
    [J]. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 131 : 69 - 77