What's in a name? Perceptions and promotion of responsible research and innovation practices across Europe

被引:15
作者
Christensen, Malene Vinther [1 ]
Nieminen, Mika [2 ]
Altenhofer, Marlene [3 ]
Tancoigne, Elise [4 ,5 ]
Mejlgaard, Niels [1 ]
Griessler, Erich [6 ]
Filacek, Adolf [7 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Danish Ctr Studies Res & Res Policy, Dept Polit Sci, Bartholins Alle 7, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland Ltd, Business Innovat & Foresight, Tampere 33101, Finland
[3] RAND Europe, Westbrook Ctr, Milton Rd, Cambridge CB4 1YG, England
[4] Univ Marne La Vallee, INRA, UMR Lisis, IFRIS, Marne,5 Blvd Descartes, F-77454 Marne La Vallee 02, France
[5] Univ Geneva, Dept Biol, Bd Carl Vogt 66, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
[6] Inst Adv Studies, Techno Sci & Societal Transformat, Josefstadterstr 39, A-1080 Vienna, Austria
[7] Czech Acad Sci, CAS Ctr Sci Technol & Soc Studies, Inst Philosophy CAS, Jilska 1, Prague 11000 1, Czech Republic
关键词
responsible research and innovation; responsible practices; research performing and funding organizations; Europe; descriptive analysis; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/scaa018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
After a decade of efforts to mainstream Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) across Europe, the policy momentum is now uncertain. We explore how 217 organisations perceive responsibility in relation to their work, what mechanisms they apply to promote responsible practices, and what hindrances to promoting RRI they observe. Most organisations are unfamiliar with RRI but employ diverse perceptions of responsibility and mechanisms to promote it nonetheless. Civil society organisations are primarily outward oriented; collaborating with others and hosting science events. Private companies are more internally focussed and more likely to formalise this effort in strategies and internal guidelines. Universities resemble private companies, while private and public funders use funding-specific tools to incentivise responsible practices. Our results suggest that RRI is still poorly institutionalised and that some areas lack attention among actors in the research and innovation systems. Future policy endeavours might benefit from addressing deficits and tapping into existing perceptions of responsibility.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 370
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Anderbjerg M. R., 1973, CLUSTER ANAL APPL
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2017, SUSTAINABILITY BASEL, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU9061036
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2016, OPEN INNOVATION OPEN
  • [6] Benn S, 2014, UNDERST ORGAN CHANG, P1
  • [7] Bernard H. R., 2017, ANAL QUALITATIVE DAT, V2nd
  • [8] Soft governance, hard consequences: The ambiguous status of unofficial guidelines
    Brandsen, Taco
    Boogers, Marcel
    Tops, Pieter
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2006, 66 (04) : 546 - 553
  • [9] Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review
    Burget, Mirjam
    Bardone, Emanuele
    Pedaste, Margus
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2017, 23 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [10] Damianova Z., 2018, NATL POLICY BRIEFS D