Measuring scientific research in emerging nano-energy field

被引:43
作者
Guan, Jiancheng [1 ]
Liu, Na [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Nano-energy; Growth pattern; Scientific influence; Collaborative networks; Cross-countries/regions comparison; Survey; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NANOSCIENCE; COLLABORATION; TECHNOLOGY; IMPACT; OUTPUT;
D O I
10.1007/s11051-014-2356-8
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to comprehensively explore scientific research profiles in the field of emerging nano-energy during 1991-2012 based on bibliometrics and social network analysis. We investigate the growth pattern of research output, and then carry out across countries/regions comparisons on research performances. Furthermore, we examine scientific collaboration across countries/regions by analyzing collaborative intensity and networks in 3- to 4-year intervals. Results indicate with an impressively exponential growth pattern of nano-energy articles, the world share of scientific "giants," such as the USA, Germany, England, France and Japan, display decreasing research trends, especially in the USA. Emerging economies, including China, South Korea and India, exhibit a rise in terms of the world share, illustrating strong development momentum of these countries in nano-energy research. Strikingly, China displays a remarkable rise in scientific influence rivaling Germany, Japan, France, and England in the last few years. Finally, the scientific collaborative network in nano-energy research has expanded steadily. Although the USA and several major European countries play significantly roles on scientific collaboration, China and South Korea exert great influence on scientific collaboration in recent years. The findings imply that emerging economies can earn competitive advantages in some emerging fields by properly engaging a catch-up strategy.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Science of science (Sci2) tool
[2]  
[Anonymous], NANOSCIENCE RES ENER
[3]   Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs [J].
Arora, Sanjay K. ;
Porter, Alan L. ;
Youtie, Jan ;
Shapira, Philip .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 95 (01) :351-370
[4]   A scientometric assessment of research output in nanoscience and nanotechnology: Pakistan perspective [J].
Bajwa, R. S. ;
Yaldram, K. ;
Rafique, S. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 94 (01) :333-342
[5]   The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011 [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
de Moya Anegon, Felix ;
Leydesdorff, Loet .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2012, 6 (02) :333-335
[6]   Nanomaterials for renewable energy production and storage [J].
Chen, Xiaobo ;
Li, Can ;
Graetzel, Michael ;
Kostecki, Robert ;
Mao, Samuel S. .
CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS, 2012, 41 (23) :7909-7937
[7]   Nanotechnology for sustainable development: retrospective and outlook [J].
Diallo, Mamadou S. ;
Fromer, Neil A. ;
Jhon, Myung S. .
JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (11)
[8]   A bibliometric analysis of solar power research from 1991 to 2010 [J].
Dong, Bensi ;
Xu, Guoqiang ;
Luo, Xiang ;
Cai, Yi ;
Gao, Wei .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2012, 93 (03) :1101-1117
[9]  
EIA U, 2013, INT EN OUTL 2013
[10]  
Fisher RA., 1921, ANN APPL BIOL, V7, P367, DOI [10.1111/j.1744-7348.1921.tb05524.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1744-7348.1921.TB05524.X]