Consumer Response to Package Downsizing: Evidence from the Chicago Ice Cream Market

被引:31
作者
Cakir, Metin [1 ]
Balagtas, Joseph V. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Bioresource Policy Business & Econ, Saskatoon, SK 57N 5A8, Canada
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Agr Econ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
Consumer behavior; Package downsizing; Demand analysis; Discrete choice model; Hierarchical Bayesian analysis; BRAND-CHOICE MODEL; BAYESIAN-ANALYSIS; SIZE; PERCEPTIONS; DIMENSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jretai.2013.06.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
It is common among producers of consumer packaged goods to reduce the volume of product per package such that the new size replaces the old one. This tactic is commonly referred to as package downsizing. In this article, we investigate the extent to which consumers have different sensitivities to package price and package size in order to shed light on the managerial implications of package downsizing. To do so, we estimate a random utility model of demand to measure consumer response to price and package size using household scanner panel data on bulk ice cream purchases in Chicago. The estimation framework involves modeling household heterogeneity, addressing price endogeneity and accounting for unbalanced choice alternatives. Our main finding is that consumers are less responsive to package size than to price; the demand elasticity with respect to package size is approximately one-fourth the magnitude of the demand elasticity with respect to price. This result implies that marketing managers can use downsizing as a hidden price increase in order to pass through increases in production costs, that is, cost of raw materials, and maintain, or increase, their profits. (C) 2013 New York University. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   CAN YOU REDUCE YOUR PACKAGE SIZE WITHOUT DAMAGING SALES [J].
ADAMS, A ;
DIBENEDETTO, CA ;
CHANDRAN, R .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 1991, 24 (04) :86-96
[2]   BAYESIAN-ANALYSIS OF BINARY AND POLYCHOTOMOUS RESPONSE DATA [J].
ALBERT, JH ;
CHIB, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 88 (422) :669-679
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1983, MARKET SCI, DOI DOI 10.1287/MKSC.2.3.203
[4]   Consumer price awareness in food shopping: the case of quantity surcharges [J].
Binkley, JK ;
Bejnarowicz, J .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2003, 79 (01) :27-35
[5]   Is obesity caused by calorie underestimation? A psychophysical model of meal size estimation [J].
Chandon, Pierre ;
Wansink, Brian .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2007, 44 (01) :84-99
[6]   Supersize in One Dimension, Downsize in Three Dimensions: Effects of Spatial Dimensionality on Size Perceptions and Preferences [J].
Chandon, Pierre ;
Ordabayeva, Nailya .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2009, 46 (06) :739-753
[7]   Beyond the endogeneity bias:: The effect of unmeasured brand characteristics on household-level brand choice models [J].
Chintagunta, P ;
Dubé, JP ;
Goh, Y .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (05) :832-849
[8]   Estimating a stockkeeping-unit-level brand choice model that combines household panel data and store data [J].
Chintagunta, PK ;
Dubé, JP .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2005, 42 (03) :368-379
[9]   Package size and price discrimination in the paper towel market [J].
Cohen, Andrew .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2008, 26 (02) :502-516
[10]   Brand-Pack Size Cannibalization Arising from Temporary Price Promotions [J].
Dawes, John G. .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2012, 88 (03) :343-355