The American Joint Commission Cancer 8th Edition Prognostic Stage Including Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score: Impact on Staging of Early Breast Cancer

被引:7
作者
O'Cearbhaill, Roisin [1 ]
Gannon, John M. [2 ]
Prichard, Ruth S. [1 ]
Walshe, Janice M. [3 ]
McDermott, Enda [1 ,2 ]
Quinn, Cecily M. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Med, Dublin, Ireland
[3] St Vincents Univ Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Dublin, Ireland
[4] St Vincents Univ Hosp, Dept Histopathol, Dublin 4, Ireland
关键词
AJCC; Breast cancer stage; Anatomic TNM stage; Prognostic stage; Oncotype DX recurrence score; DISTANT RECURRENCE; ANATOMIC STAGE; COMMITTEE; SYSTEM; SURVIVAL; VALIDATION; BIOMARKERS; TAMOXIFEN; RECEPTOR; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1159/000493363
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: The American Joint Commission Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual 8th edition introduced a breast cancer (BC) Prognostic Stage (PS) that combines tumour grade, oestrogen (ER), progesterone (PgR), and human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2) receptor status with Anatomic TNM Stage (AS). In a further modification, patients with early BC and an Oncotype DX (R) Recurrence Score (RS) <11 are assigned to PS 1A irrespective of grade and size up to 5 cm. This study profiles the impact of these changes on staging in patients with early BC and RS <11. Methods: A total of 127 patients, with primary BC and RS <11, were identified from a consecutive series of 729 patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, lymph node-negative, primary BC whose tumours were tested using the Oncotype DX (R) 21 multigene assay. Each patient was assigned AS, PS, and RS-modified PS, and staging categories were compared. Results: Applying AS, 100 patients were stage IA and 27 IIA. Applying PS, 89 were stage IA, 33 IB, 4 IIA, and 1 IIB. All patients were IA according to RS-modified PS. Comparing PS to AS, 26.7% of patients (n = 34) changed stage, 9.4% (n = 12) to a higher and 17.3% (n = 22) to a lower stage. RS-modified PS versus AS resulted in downstaging in 21.3% (n = 27). Comparing PS modified by RS to PS alone, 29.9% (n = 38) were downstaged. Conclusion: Application of PS and RS-modified PS results in tumour downstaging in approximately 20% of patients with early BC. Upstaging was observed in 9% of patients when staged according to PS and was primarily due to the impact of high histological grade. (c) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 82
页数:6
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
AJCC AJCoC, BREAST CANC STAG
[2]   Tumour Heterogeneity of Breast Cancer: From Morphology to Personalised Medicine [J].
Aleskandarany, Mohammed A. ;
Vandenberghe, Michel E. ;
Marchio, Caterina ;
Ellis, Ian O. ;
Sapino, Anna ;
Rakha, Emad A. .
PATHOBIOLOGY, 2018, 85 (1-2) :23-34
[3]   The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging [J].
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Greene, Frederick L. ;
Edge, Stephen B. ;
Compton, Carolyn C. ;
Gershenwald, Jeffrey E. ;
Brookland, Robert K. ;
Meyer, Laura ;
Gress, Donna M. ;
Byrd, David R. ;
Winchester, David P. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2017, 67 (02) :93-99
[4]  
[Anonymous], AJCC CANC STAGING MA
[5]   Comparing Breast Cancer Multiparameter Tests in the OPTIMA Prelim Trial: No Test Is More Equal Than the Others [J].
Bartlett, John M. S. ;
Bayani, Jane ;
Marshall, Andrea ;
Dunn, Janet A. ;
Campbell, Amy ;
Cunningham, Carrie ;
Sobol, Monika S. ;
Hall, Peter S. ;
Poole, Christopher J. ;
Cameron, David A. ;
Earl, Helena M. ;
Rea, Daniel W. ;
Macpherson, Iain R. ;
Canney, Peter ;
Francis, Adele ;
McCabe, Christopher ;
Pinder, Sarah E. ;
Hughes-Davies, Luke ;
Makris, Andreas ;
Stein, Robert C. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2016, 108 (09)
[6]   Survival of invasive breast cancer according to the Nottingham Prognostic Index in cases diagnosed in 1990-1999 [J].
Blamey, R. W. ;
Ellis, I. O. ;
Pinder, S. E. ;
Lee, A. H. S. ;
Macmillan, R. D. ;
Morgan, D. A. L. ;
Robertson, J. F. R. ;
Mitchell, M. J. ;
Ball, G. R. ;
Haybittle, J. L. ;
Elston, C. W. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 43 (10) :1548-1555
[7]   Comparison of EndoPredict and EPclin With Oncotype DX Recurrence Score for Prediction of Risk of Distant Recurrence After Endocrine Therapy [J].
Buus, Richard ;
Sestak, Ivana ;
Kronenwett, Ralf ;
Denkert, Carsten ;
Dubsky, Peter ;
Krappmann, Kristin ;
Scheer, Marsel ;
Petry, Christoph ;
Cuzick, Jack ;
Dowsett, Mitch .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2016, 108 (11)
[8]  
Chaudhary Lubna N, 2016, Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther, V9, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.hemonc.2015.12.001
[9]   Comparison of Oncotype DXA® Recurrence ScoreA® with other risk assessment tools including the Nottingham Prognostic Index in the identification of patients with low-risk invasive breast cancer [J].
Cotter, Maura Brid ;
Dakin, Alex ;
Maguire, Aoife ;
Walshe, Janice M. ;
Kennedy, M. John ;
Dunne, Barbara ;
Riain, Ciaran O. ;
Quinn, Cecily M. .
VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2017, 471 (03) :321-328
[10]   The new TNM-based staging of breast cancer [J].
Cserni, Gabor ;
Chmielik, Ewa ;
Cserni, Balint ;
Tot, Tibor .
VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2018, 472 (05) :697-703