Can Road Toll Convince Car Travelers to Adjust Their Departure Times? Accounting for the Effect of Choice Behavior under Long and Short Holidays

被引:4
作者
Zhu, Haiyan [1 ,2 ]
Guan, Hongzhi [1 ]
Han, Yan [1 ]
Li, Wanying [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Coll Architecture & Civil Engn, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[2] Qinghai Nationalities Univ, Sch Civil & Traff Engn, Xining 810007, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
holiday travel behavior; departure time; long and short holidays; road toll; car travelers; multinomial logit model; COMMUTING TRIPS; CONGESTION; MODEL; INFORMATION; WORK; AVOIDANCE; TOURISTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/su122410470
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The adjustment of road toll is an important measure that can alleviate road traffic congestion by convincing car travelers to travel during off-peak times. In order to reduce congestion on the expressway on the first day of a holiday, factors that affect the departure times of holiday travelers must be comprehensively understood to determine the best strategy to persuade car travelers to avoid peak travel times. This paper takes holiday car travelers as the research object and explores the characteristics and rules of departure time choice behavior for different holiday lengths. Based on Utility Maximization Theory, a multinomial logit (MNL) model of departure time choice for a three-day short holiday and a seven-day long holiday was established. Model calibration and elastic analysis were carried out using Revealed Preference/Stated Preference (RP/SP) survey data. Additionally, the influence of the highway toll policy on departure times for long and short holidays was analyzed. The results show that the rate of first-day departures is much higher than that of other departure times for both short and long vacations under the current policy of free holiday passage on highways. Factors such as trip duration, size of the tourist group, the number of visits, travel range, travel time, monthly income, occupation, age and road toll have a significant influence on the departure time decisions of holiday car travelers, and the effect and degree of influence are markedly different for different holiday lengths. The effects of tolls for each departure time and different pricing scenarios on the choice behavior of travelers are different between long and short holidays. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the road toll policy also varies for travelers with different travel distances. This study can provide useful information for the guidance of holiday travelers, the management of holiday tolls on expressways and the formulation of holiday leave time.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 29
页数:29
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   AN ANALYSIS OF THE COMMUTER DEPARTURE TIME DECISION [J].
ABKOWITZ, MD .
TRANSPORTATION, 1981, 10 (03) :283-297
[2]   Congestion tolls and parking fees: A comparison of the potential effect on travel behavior [J].
Albert, Gila ;
Mahalel, David .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2006, 13 (06) :496-502
[3]  
AMAP, 2018, TRAV REP NAT DAY 201, P1
[4]  
[Anonymous], TRANSP POLICY
[5]  
Arian A., 2018, Advances in transport policy and planning, P145, DOI [DOI 10.1016/BS.ATPP.2018.07.001, 10.1016/bs.atpp.2018.07.001]
[6]   Analysis of tourist behaviour based on the tracking data collected using a mobile communication instrument [J].
Asakura, Yasuo ;
Iryo, Takamasa .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2007, 41 (07) :684-690
[7]   Investigation of the traffic congestion during public holiday and the impact of the toll-exemption policy [J].
Bao, Yue ;
Xiao, Feng ;
Gao, Zaihan ;
Gao, Ziyou .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2017, 104 :58-81
[8]  
Ben-Akiva M., 1985, Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand
[9]   Rewarding rush-hour avoidance: A study of commuters' travel behavior [J].
Ben-Elia, Eran ;
Ettema, Dick .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2011, 45 (07) :567-582
[10]   Carrots versus sticks: Rewarding commuters for avoiding the rush-hour-a study of willingness to participate [J].
Ben-Elia, Eran ;
Ettema, Dick .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2009, 16 (02) :68-76