Know when to walk away: contingent movement and the evolution of cooperation

被引:212
作者
Aktipis, CA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Psychol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
evolution; cooperation; walk away; tit-for-tat; agent-based; movement; exit;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.06.020
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Models of the evolution of cooperation suggest that an important characteristic of successful strategies is the ability to respond contingently to the social environment. A number of mechanisms by which this can be accomplished have been suggested, some of which require relatively complex information processing systems. This research explores relaxing the requirements on information processing while preserving the evolvability of a cooperative strategy. The agent-based computer simulations reported here show that 'Walk Away,' a behavioral rule of extremely limited complexity (move after partner defects), can outperform more complex strategies under a number of conditions. Previous simulations of exit strategies have not examined the effect of implicit and explicit movement costs, different error rates, or the simultaneous presence of TFT and PAVLOV. The simulations reported here establish that the Walk Away strategy resists invasion and can invade a population of defectors at a lower initial frequency than any other strategy. The Walk Away strategy was successful, despite its simplicity, because it exploited aspects of the physical and social environment. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 260
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Simple heuristics that make us smart
[2]  
Axelrod R., 1997, COMPLEXITY COOPERATI
[3]  
Axelrod R, 2006, EVOLUTION COOPERATIO
[4]   Unlocking the doors of the prisoner's dilemma: Dependence, selectivity, and cooperation [J].
Boone, RT ;
Macy, MW .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1999, 62 (01) :32-52
[5]   PUNISHMENT ALLOWS THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION (OR ANYTHING ELSE) IN SIZABLE GROUPS [J].
BOYD, R ;
RICHERSON, PJ .
ETHOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1992, 13 (03) :171-195
[6]   Evolution of cooperation in spatially structured populations [J].
Brauchli, K ;
Killingback, T ;
Doebeli, M .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1999, 200 (04) :405-417
[7]   ROVER - A STRATEGY FOR EXPLOITING COOPERATORS IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT [J].
DUGATKIN, LA ;
WILSON, DS .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1991, 138 (03) :687-701
[8]   THE EVOLUTION OF THE CON ARTIST [J].
DUGATKIN, LA .
ETHOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1992, 13 (01) :3-18
[9]   THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION IN MOBILE ORGANISMS [J].
ENQUIST, M ;
LEIMAR, O .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1993, 45 (04) :747-757
[10]   ASSORTMENT OF ENCOUNTERS AND EVOLUTION OF COOPERATIVENESS [J].
ESHEL, I ;
CAVALLISFORZA, LL .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1982, 79 (04) :1331-1335