EU migration, out-of-work benefits and reciprocity: Are member states justified in restricting access to welfare rights?

被引:7
作者
Efthymiou, Dimitrios [1 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Theodor W Adorno Pl 6, D-60629 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
Brexit; EU migration; European Union; migration; out-of-work benefits; reciprocity; social justice; social rights; welfare rights; welfare state; IMMIGRATION; MOVEMENT; JUSTICE;
D O I
10.1177/1474885118825360
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article examines whether restrictions on access to welfare rights for EU immigrants are justifiable on grounds of reciprocity. Recently political theorists have supported some robust restrictions on the basis of fairness. They argue that if EU immigrants do not immediately contribute sufficiently to the provision of basic collective goods in the host state, restrictions on their access to the welfare state are justified. I argue that these accounts of the principle of reciprocity rely on an ambiguous conception of contribution that cannot deliver the restrictions it advocates. Several strategies open to those advocating reciprocity-based restrictions are considered and found wanting. This article defends that verdict from a number of objections.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 567
页数:21
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Abizadeh A, 2016, MIGRATION POLITICAL, p115
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1971, THEORY JUSTICE, DOI DOI 10.4159/9780674042605
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Self -Ownership, Freedom and Equality
[4]  
[Anonymous], BOUNDS SOLIDARITY IN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1930, CAPITAL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, University World News
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, FACT FIND AN IMP MEM
[8]  
Arneson R, 2014, ROUTLEDGE HDB GLOBAL, p35
[9]  
Attas D., 2000, RES PUBLICA-NETH, V6, P73, DOI [10.1023/A:1009692722806, DOI 10.1023/A:1009692722806]
[10]  
Barry Brian., 1989, Theories of Justice, VI.