Academics and Scientists as Biotech Communicators: Perspectives, Capabilities, and Challenges in Southeast Asia

被引:0
作者
Tome, Kristine Grace N. [1 ]
Navarro, Mariechel J. [1 ]
Aldemita, Rhodora R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Serv Acquisit Agribiotech Applicat, Southeast Asia Ctr, IRRI, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines
来源
PHILIPPINE JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE | 2014年 / 39卷 / 02期
关键词
academics; biotechnology; communication; public engagement; popularization of science; science; scientists; SCIENCE; TALKING;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
University professors and public sector scientists are regarded as highly credible sources of information on biotechnology. Hence, their role in science communication, particularly on biotechnology is critical. A survey was conducted to investigate how academics and scientists involved in crop biotechnology view science communication and their role in public awareness and understanding. Two hundred seventeen (217) respondents from 63 different academic and research institutions in the Philippines, Malaysia, and Indonesia were asked to answer a questionnaire (onsite and through electronic mail). A five-point Likert scale was used to determine the views of the respondents about science/biotech communication. Although they noted the importance of science communication, only an average of 11 percent of their working time was devoted to it, with most devoted to research and instruction. Most of them (40%) had low level of engagement activity (1 to 10 activities/year) mostly conducted for students or staff from other institutions and farmers with an objective of fostering awareness and understanding on biotech, creating public acceptance towards biotech, and addressing issues concerning the risks and benefits of biotech. A total of 31 respondents (10%) have attended training on science communication, which were mostly sponsored by non-governmental organizations. With more funds for science communication activities, additional training, and career incentives, they would be more encouraged to conduct more science communication activities. The respondents feel that an integration of science/biotech communication as theme or activity in mainstream organizations or professional societies to enable growth in the field through constant exchange of ideas and experiences will lead to a more informed public about biotechnology. Nevertheless, when asked about public acceptance on biotechnology, majority (73%) said that the public has accepted the technology signified by the adoption of biotech products in the country.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 57
页数:14
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Stakeholder attitudes toward the risks and benefits of agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: A comparison between Mexico and the Philippines
    Aerni, P
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2002, 22 (06) : 1123 - 1137
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1991, SITUATED LEARNING LE
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, SCI COMMUNICATION SC
  • [4] Arujanan M., 2011, COMMUNICATION CHALLE, P180
  • [5] Predicting scientists' participation in public life
    Besley, John C.
    Oh, Sang Hwa
    Nisbet, Matthew
    [J]. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2013, 22 (08) : 971 - 987
  • [6] Science communication reconsidered
    Bubela, Tania
    Nisbet, Matthew C.
    Borchelt, Rick
    Brunger, Fern
    Critchley, Cristine
    Einsiedel, Edna
    Geller, Gail
    Gupta, Anil
    Hampel, Juergen
    Hyde-Lay, Robyn
    Jandciu, Eric W.
    Jones, S. Ashley
    Kolopack, Pam
    Lane, Summer
    Lougheed, Tim
    Nerlich, Brigitte
    Ogbogu, Ubaka
    O'Riordan, Kathleen
    Ouellette, Colin
    Spear, Mike
    Strauss, Stephen
    Thavaratnam, Thushaanthini
    Willemse, Lisa
    Caulfield, Timothy
    [J]. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2009, 27 (06) : 514 - 518
  • [7] Bultitude K., 2010, INTRO SCI COMMUNICAT
  • [8] Science communication: a contemporary definition
    Burns, TW
    O'Connor, DJ
    Stocklmayer, SM
    [J]. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2003, 12 (02) : 183 - 202
  • [9] Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature
    Carpini, MXD
    Cook, FL
    Jacobs, LR
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 7 : 315 - 344
  • [10] Castillo G., 2003, SCI COMMUNICATION WH