Prioritizing ecosystem services in rapidly urbanizing river basins: A spatial multi-criteria analytic approach

被引:59
作者
Vollmer, Derek [1 ,2 ]
Pribadi, Didit Okta [3 ]
Remondi, Federica [1 ,4 ]
Rustiadi, Ernan [5 ]
Gret-Regamey, Adrienne [2 ]
机构
[1] Singapore ETH Ctr Global Environm Sustainabil, Future Cities Lab, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Planning Landscape & Urban Syst, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Strateg Planning & Landscape Management, D-80290 Munich, Germany
[4] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Engn, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Bogor Agr Univ, Ctr Reg Syst Anal Planning & Dev, Bogor, Indonesia
关键词
Multi-criteria analysis; Ecosystem services; Regional planning; Tradeoffs; Land use; Hydrologic services; DECISION-ANALYSIS; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; TRADE-OFFS; MANAGEMENT; SUPPORT; CONSERVATION; EXPERIENCES; RECREATION; VALUATION; LANDSCAPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scs.2015.10.004
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Spatially explicit information on ecosystem services can be an important input to regional spatial planning, but must be framed in a particular social context in order to be useful. We present a case study in metropolitan Jakarta, Indonesia, where stakeholders are discussing a spatial plan to help mitigate flooding risk, conserve scarce agricultural land, and restore forests in the upper catchment areas. We demonstrate an application of a four-step spatial multi-criteria analytical (MCA) approach that involves scenario development, ecosystem service quantification and mapping, preference weighting, and optimization to maximize preferred ecosystem services while minimizing cost. We improve upon similarly-oriented MCAs by incorporating information on ecosystem service potential, supply, beneficiaries, and likely costs to conserve them, with the aim of assisting stakeholders in negotiating future land development. Stakeholder-weighted preferences provide information on potential areas of conflict or agreement, but the aggregated weights do not have a significant impact on the optimization model's outputs. Our results also reveal possible synergies between, for example, biodiversity conservation and erosion control, which are typically considered and planned for by separate stakeholder groups. We also find that if we include monetary estimates of flood damages by sub-basin and population data by groundwater basin, optimal solutions include more expensive interventions when compared to a model omitting this information. Overall, our approach offers a transparent way to collect and process relevant information on regional ecosystem services, and can be particularly useful in areas where land use is changing rapidly and land use controls are either weak or decentralized. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 252
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Multi-Criteria Combination Approach to Determine Spatial Intervention Prioritization of Urban Flood Based on Source Tracking Analysis
    Wang, Xinghua
    Hou, Jingming
    Hu, Guangyao
    Gao, Xujun
    Shen, Ruozhu
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2024, 38 (03) : 893 - 914
  • [42] Coastal Flooding Risk Assessment Using a GIS-Based Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approach
    Hadipour, Vahid
    Vafaie, Freydoon
    Deilami, Kaveh
    WATER, 2020, 12 (09)
  • [43] Participatory multi-criteria decision analysis in valuing peatland ecosystem services-Trade-offs related to peat extraction vs. pristine peatlands in Southern Finland
    Saarikoski, Heli
    Mustajoki, Jyri
    Hjerppe, Turo
    Aapala, Kaisu
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 162 : 17 - 28
  • [44] Modeling the drivers of urban land use changes in Lusaka, Zambia using multi-criteria evaluation: An analytic network process approach
    Simwanda, Matamyo
    Murayama, Yuji
    Ranagalage, Manjula
    LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 92
  • [45] Flood Risk Assessment Using Multi-Criteria Spatial Analysis Case Study: Gilort River between Bălcesti and Bolbocesti
    Giurea, Alexandru
    Comanescu, Laura
    Dobre, Robert
    Nedelea, Alexandru
    Mirea, Ioana
    WATER, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [46] GIS-Based Multi-criteria Approach Surface Irrigation Potential Assessment for Ethiopian River Basin: in Case of Upper Awash River Basin
    Gemechu, Megersa Fekadu
    PROCESS INTEGRATION AND OPTIMIZATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 7 (03) : 501 - 521
  • [47] GIS-Based Multi-criteria Approach Surface Irrigation Potential Assessment for Ethiopian River Basin: in Case of Upper Awash River Basin
    Megersa Fekadu Gemechu
    Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 2023, 7 : 501 - 521
  • [48] Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services: a distance decay approach to quantify willingness to pay for improvements in Heihe River Basin ecosystems
    Khan, Sufyan Ullah
    Khan, Imran
    Zhao, Minjuan
    Chien, Hsiaoping
    Lu, Qian
    Ali, Muhammad Abu Sufyan
    Khan, Arshad Ahmad
    Fahad, Shah
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (24) : 25247 - 25261
  • [49] Conflicting interests of ecosystem services: Multi-criteria modelling and indirect evaluation of trade-offs between monetary and non-monetary measures
    Wam, Hilde Karine
    Bunnefeld, Nils
    Clarke, Nicholas
    Hofstad, Ole
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 22 : 280 - 288
  • [50] Analytic Network Process-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Approach and Sensitivity Analysis for Temporary Facility Layout Planning in Construction Projects
    Jin, Haifeng
    Zhang, Mingyuan
    Yuan, Yongbo
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2018, 8 (12):