Prioritizing ecosystem services in rapidly urbanizing river basins: A spatial multi-criteria analytic approach

被引:59
|
作者
Vollmer, Derek [1 ,2 ]
Pribadi, Didit Okta [3 ]
Remondi, Federica [1 ,4 ]
Rustiadi, Ernan [5 ]
Gret-Regamey, Adrienne [2 ]
机构
[1] Singapore ETH Ctr Global Environm Sustainabil, Future Cities Lab, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Planning Landscape & Urban Syst, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Strateg Planning & Landscape Management, D-80290 Munich, Germany
[4] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Engn, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Bogor Agr Univ, Ctr Reg Syst Anal Planning & Dev, Bogor, Indonesia
关键词
Multi-criteria analysis; Ecosystem services; Regional planning; Tradeoffs; Land use; Hydrologic services; DECISION-ANALYSIS; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; TRADE-OFFS; MANAGEMENT; SUPPORT; CONSERVATION; EXPERIENCES; RECREATION; VALUATION; LANDSCAPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scs.2015.10.004
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Spatially explicit information on ecosystem services can be an important input to regional spatial planning, but must be framed in a particular social context in order to be useful. We present a case study in metropolitan Jakarta, Indonesia, where stakeholders are discussing a spatial plan to help mitigate flooding risk, conserve scarce agricultural land, and restore forests in the upper catchment areas. We demonstrate an application of a four-step spatial multi-criteria analytical (MCA) approach that involves scenario development, ecosystem service quantification and mapping, preference weighting, and optimization to maximize preferred ecosystem services while minimizing cost. We improve upon similarly-oriented MCAs by incorporating information on ecosystem service potential, supply, beneficiaries, and likely costs to conserve them, with the aim of assisting stakeholders in negotiating future land development. Stakeholder-weighted preferences provide information on potential areas of conflict or agreement, but the aggregated weights do not have a significant impact on the optimization model's outputs. Our results also reveal possible synergies between, for example, biodiversity conservation and erosion control, which are typically considered and planned for by separate stakeholder groups. We also find that if we include monetary estimates of flood damages by sub-basin and population data by groundwater basin, optimal solutions include more expensive interventions when compared to a model omitting this information. Overall, our approach offers a transparent way to collect and process relevant information on regional ecosystem services, and can be particularly useful in areas where land use is changing rapidly and land use controls are either weak or decentralized. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 252
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prioritizing urban water scarcity mitigation strategies based on hybrid multi-criteria decision approach under fuzzy environment
    Ekmekciog, Oemer
    Koc, Kerim
    Dabanli, Ismail
    Deniz, Ali
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2022, 87
  • [22] Carbon storage, timber production, and biodiversity: comparing ecosystem services with multi-criteria decision analysis
    Schwenk, W. Scott
    Donovan, Therese M.
    Keeton, William S.
    Nunery, Jared S.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2012, 22 (05) : 1612 - 1627
  • [23] Minimizing impacts of land use change on ecosystem services using multi-criteria heuristic analysis
    Keller, Arturo A.
    Fournier, Eric
    Fox, Jessica
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 156 : 23 - 30
  • [24] Multi-criteria decision analysis in Bayesian networks - Diagnosing ecosystem service trade-offs in a hydropower regulated river
    Barton, David N.
    Sundt, Hakon
    Bustos, Ana Adeva
    Fjeldstad, Hans-Petter
    Hedger, Richard
    Forseth, Torbjorn
    Kohler, Berit
    Aas, Oystein
    Alfredsen, Knut
    Madsen, Anders L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2020, 124
  • [25] Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification by Using a Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (ANP) Approach
    Kiris, Safak
    INFORMATICA, 2013, 24 (02) : 199 - 217
  • [26] Scaling Effects in Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Aggregation in Integrated River Basin Management
    Taha, Rania
    Dietrich, Joerg
    Dehnhardt, Alexandra
    Hirschfeld, Jesko
    WATER, 2019, 11 (02)
  • [27] Sustainable Tourism around Ecosystem Services: Application to a Case in Costa Rica Using Multi-Criteria Methods
    Araya, Juan Diego
    Hernando, Ana
    Tejera, Rosario
    Velazquez, Javier
    LAND, 2023, 12 (03)
  • [28] Integrating flood hazard into site selection of detention basins using spatial multi-criteria decision-making
    Ahmadisharaf, Ebrahim
    Tajrishy, Masoud
    Alamdari, Nasrin
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 59 (08) : 1397 - 1417
  • [29] Mapping the potential for Payments for Ecosystem Services schemes to improve water quality in agricultural catchments: A multi-criteria approach based on the supply and demand concept
    Roberts, William M.
    Couldrick, Laurence B.
    Williams, Gareth
    Robins, Dawn
    Cooper, Dave
    WATER RESEARCH, 2021, 206
  • [30] An expert-based approach to forest road network planning by combining Delphi and spatial multi-criteria evaluation
    Hayati, Elyas
    Majnounian, Baris
    Abdi, Ehsan
    Sessions, John
    Makhdoum, Majid
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2013, 185 (02) : 1767 - 1776