Prioritizing ecosystem services in rapidly urbanizing river basins: A spatial multi-criteria analytic approach

被引:59
|
作者
Vollmer, Derek [1 ,2 ]
Pribadi, Didit Okta [3 ]
Remondi, Federica [1 ,4 ]
Rustiadi, Ernan [5 ]
Gret-Regamey, Adrienne [2 ]
机构
[1] Singapore ETH Ctr Global Environm Sustainabil, Future Cities Lab, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Planning Landscape & Urban Syst, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Strateg Planning & Landscape Management, D-80290 Munich, Germany
[4] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Engn, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Bogor Agr Univ, Ctr Reg Syst Anal Planning & Dev, Bogor, Indonesia
关键词
Multi-criteria analysis; Ecosystem services; Regional planning; Tradeoffs; Land use; Hydrologic services; DECISION-ANALYSIS; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; TRADE-OFFS; MANAGEMENT; SUPPORT; CONSERVATION; EXPERIENCES; RECREATION; VALUATION; LANDSCAPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scs.2015.10.004
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Spatially explicit information on ecosystem services can be an important input to regional spatial planning, but must be framed in a particular social context in order to be useful. We present a case study in metropolitan Jakarta, Indonesia, where stakeholders are discussing a spatial plan to help mitigate flooding risk, conserve scarce agricultural land, and restore forests in the upper catchment areas. We demonstrate an application of a four-step spatial multi-criteria analytical (MCA) approach that involves scenario development, ecosystem service quantification and mapping, preference weighting, and optimization to maximize preferred ecosystem services while minimizing cost. We improve upon similarly-oriented MCAs by incorporating information on ecosystem service potential, supply, beneficiaries, and likely costs to conserve them, with the aim of assisting stakeholders in negotiating future land development. Stakeholder-weighted preferences provide information on potential areas of conflict or agreement, but the aggregated weights do not have a significant impact on the optimization model's outputs. Our results also reveal possible synergies between, for example, biodiversity conservation and erosion control, which are typically considered and planned for by separate stakeholder groups. We also find that if we include monetary estimates of flood damages by sub-basin and population data by groundwater basin, optimal solutions include more expensive interventions when compared to a model omitting this information. Overall, our approach offers a transparent way to collect and process relevant information on regional ecosystem services, and can be particularly useful in areas where land use is changing rapidly and land use controls are either weak or decentralized. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 252
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multi-criteria spatial approach for mapping urban ecosystem services demand
    Li, Fangzheng
    Guo, Shiyi
    Li, Di
    Li, Xiong
    Li, Jing
    Xie, Shuang
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 112
  • [2] Analyzing the spatial patterns and drivers of ecosystem services in rapidly urbanizing Taihu Lake Basin of China
    Ai, Junyong
    Sun, Xiang
    Feng, Lan
    Li, Yangfan
    Zhu, Xiaodong
    FRONTIERS OF EARTH SCIENCE, 2015, 9 (03) : 531 - 545
  • [3] Identifying hotspots and management of critical ecosystem services in rapidly urbanizing Yangtze River Delta Region, China
    Cai, Wenbo
    Gibbs, David
    Zhang, Lang
    Ferrier, Graham
    Cai, Yongli
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 191 : 258 - 267
  • [4] A land-cover-based approach to assessing ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics in the rapidly urbanizing Yangtze River Delta region
    Tao, Yu
    Wang, Hongning
    Ou, Weixin
    Guo, Jie
    LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 72 : 250 - 258
  • [5] A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning
    Koschke, Lars
    Fuerst, Christine
    Frank, Susanne
    Makeschin, Franz
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 : 54 - 66
  • [6] Modelling Natural Capital: A Proposal for a Mixed Multi-criteria Approach to Assign Management Priorities to Ecosystem Services
    de Castro Pardo, Monica
    Fernandez Martinez, Pascual
    Guaita Martinez, Jose Manuel
    Martin Martin, Jose Maria
    CONTEMPORARY ECONOMICS, 2020, 14 (01) : 22 - 37
  • [7] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services
    Saarikoski, Heli
    Mustajoki, Jyri
    Barton, David N.
    Geneletti, Davide
    Langemeyer, Johannes
    Gomez-Baggethun, Erik
    Marttunen, Mika
    Antunes, Paula
    Keune, Hans
    Santos, Rui
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 22 : 238 - 249
  • [8] Multi-criteria framework for identifying the trade-offs and synergies relationship of ecosystem services based on ecosystem services bundles
    Wu, Linlin
    Sun, Caige
    Fan, Fenglei
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 144
  • [9] Spatial and temporal characteristics and driving mechanisms of recreational ecosystem services supply-demand mismatch in rapidly urbanizing areas: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta
    Tang, Ruien
    Hou, Guolin
    Chen, Yueyi
    Liu, Xiao
    Chu, Shaoying
    Li, Li
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2025, 171
  • [10] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Scenario Insights into Spatial Responses and Promotion Under Ecosystem Services
    Liu, Jingya
    Qin, Keyu
    Xiao, Yu
    Xie, Gaodi
    LAND, 2024, 13 (11)