Adaptive dynamic range shift (ADRIFT) quantitative phase imaging

被引:33
作者
Toda, Keiichiro [1 ]
Tamamitsu, Miu [1 ]
Ideguchi, Takuro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Dept Phys, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Inst Photon Sci & Technol, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
[3] Japan Sci & Technol Agcy, PRESTO, Saitama 3320012, Japan
关键词
DIFFRACTION TOMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL HOLOGRAPHY; MICROSCOPY; CONTRAST; LIGHT; CELLS;
D O I
10.1038/s41377-020-00435-z
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Quantitative phase imaging (QPI) with its high-contrast images of optical phase delay (OPD) maps is often used for label-free single-cell analysis. Contrary to other imaging methods, sensitivity improvement has not been intensively explored because conventional QPI is sensitive enough to observe the surface roughness of a substrate that restricts the minimum measurable OPD. However, emerging QPI techniques that utilize, for example, differential image analysis of consecutive temporal frames, such as mid-infrared photothermal QPI, mitigate the minimum OPD limit by decoupling the static OPD contribution and allow measurement of much smaller OPDs. Here, we propose and demonstrate supersensitive QPI with an expanded dynamic range. It is enabled by adaptive dynamic range shift through a combination of wavefront shaping and dark-field QPI techniques. As a proof-of-concept demonstration, we show dynamic range expansion (sensitivity improvement) of QPI by a factor of 6.6 and its utility in improving the sensitivity of mid-infrared photothermal QPI. This technique can also be applied for wide-field scattering imaging of dynamically changing nanoscale objects inside and outside a biological cell without losing global cellular morphological image information.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] VIDEO-ENHANCED CONTRAST, DIFFERENTIAL INTERFERENCE CONTRAST (AVEC-DIC) MICROSCOPY - A NEW METHOD CAPABLE OF ANALYZING MICROTUBULE-RELATED MOTILITY IN THE RETICULOPODIAL NETWORK OF ALLOGROMIA LATICOLLARIS
    ALLEN, RD
    ALLEN, NS
    TRAVIS, JL
    [J]. CELL MOTILITY AND THE CYTOSKELETON, 1981, 1 (03): : 291 - 302
  • [2] Diffraction phase microscopy: principles and applications in materials and life sciences
    Bhaduri, Basanta
    Edwards, Chris
    Hoa Pham
    Zhou, Renjie
    Nguyen, Tan H.
    Goddard, Lynford L.
    Popescu, Gabriel
    [J]. ADVANCES IN OPTICS AND PHOTONICS, 2014, 6 (01): : 57 - 119
  • [3] Optical tweezers assisted quantitative phase imaging led to thickness mapping of red blood cells
    Cardenas, Nelson
    Mohanty, Samarendra K.
    [J]. APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2013, 103 (01)
  • [4] Cotte Y, 2013, NAT PHOTONICS, V7, P113, DOI [10.1038/nphoton.2012.329, 10.1038/NPHOTON.2012.329]
  • [5] Digital holography for quantitative phase-contrast imaging
    Cuche, E
    Bevilacqua, F
    Depeursinge, C
    [J]. OPTICS LETTERS, 1999, 24 (05) : 291 - 293
  • [6] Revealing Compartmentalized Diffusion in Living Cells with Interferometric Scattering Microscopy
    de Wit, Gabrielle
    Albrecht, David
    Ewers, Helge
    Kukura, Philipp
    [J]. BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 114 (12) : 2945 - 2950
  • [7] VISUALIZATION OF THE DYNAMIC INSTABILITY OF INDIVIDUAL MICROTUBULES BY DARK-FIELD MICROSCOPY
    HORIO, T
    HOTANI, H
    [J]. NATURE, 1986, 321 (6070) : 605 - 607
  • [8] Horstmeyer R, 2015, NAT PHOTONICS, V9, P563, DOI [10.1038/nphoton.2015.140, 10.1038/NPHOTON.2015.140]
  • [9] Pushing phase and amplitude sensitivity limits in interferometric microscopy
    Hosseini, Poorya
    Zhou, Renjie
    Kim, Yang-Hyo
    Peres, Chiara
    Diaspro, Alberto
    Kuang, Cuifang
    Yaqoob, Zahid
    So, Peter T. C.
    [J]. OPTICS LETTERS, 2016, 41 (07) : 1656 - 1659
  • [10] Local Optimization of Wave-fronts for optimal sensitivity PHase Imaging (LowPhi)
    Juffmann, Thomas
    Sommer, Andres de los Rios
    Gigan, Sylvain
    [J]. OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 454