Mapping and Analyzing the Scientific Map of Knowledge Organization Using Research Indexed in the WOS Database

被引:0
作者
Sadabadi, Ali Asghar [1 ]
Ramezani, Saeed [2 ]
Fartash, Kiarash [1 ]
Nikijoo, Iman [1 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Tehran, Tehran 009821, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Tehran, Iran
来源
KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION | 2022年 / 49卷 / 06期
关键词
knowledge organization; scientific map; co-citation analysis; co-authorship; social network analysis; INTANGIBLE ASSETS; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; INFORMATION-SCIENCE; SOCIAL NETWORKS; SCIENTOMETRICS; CENTRALITY; INNOVATION; MANAGEMENT; DOMAIN;
D O I
10.5771/0943-7444-2022-6-448
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Scientometrics has found many applications in describing, explaining and predicting the scientific status of researchers, educational and research groups, universities, organizations and countries in various national and international arenas. By studying the scientific products of different countries, their status in the production of science can be evaluated. Present study was conducted using a scientometrics approach and using co-word analysis and social network analysis (SNA) to investigate relationships in the field of knowledge organization. In this regard, research indexed in web of science on the topic of "knowledge organization" has been analyzed using software including VOSviewer, Gephi, Publish or Perish. The findings of the study show that the most frequently used topics and words are knowledge organization and classification. Also, the most valuable subject areas were identified based on the maps drawn using the closeness and centrality of indexes, taxonomy, ontology and knowledge organization systems. Co-authorship analysis revealed that the co-authorship network is discrete and has low-density, with a total of 12,491 citations in all articles. Also, the most prolific author is Hjorland, followed by Smiraglia and Dahlberg. using the co-word map of knowledge organization, policymakers can plan appropriately through the knowledge of the research and thematic status of knowledge organization.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 464
页数:17
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   The Power of Scientometrics and the Development of Economics [J].
Aistleitner, Matthias ;
Kapeller, Jakob ;
Steinerberger, Stefan .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES, 2018, 52 (03) :816-834
[2]  
Andres A, 2009, MEASURING ACADEMIC RESEARCH: HOW TO UNDERTAKE A BIBLIOMETRIC STUDY, P1, DOI 10.1533/9781780630182
[3]  
Anghel I., 2008, Theoretical and Applied Economics, V3, P75
[4]   Impact of investment in intangible assets on corporate performance in India [J].
Bhatia, Aparna ;
Aggarwal, Khushboo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 60 (05) :1058-1073
[5]   The relation between intellectual capital and intangible assets of pharmaceutical companies [J].
Boekestein, Bram .
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2006, 7 (02) :241-+
[6]   SCIENTOMETRICS - NEW OPPORTUNITIES [J].
BOOKSTEIN, A .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1994, 30 (2-3) :455-460
[7]  
Brodka P., 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computational Aspects of Social Networks (CASoN 2011), P237, DOI 10.1109/CASON.2011.6085951
[8]  
Broughton V., 2005, European curriculum reflections on library and information science education, P133
[9]   Social Network Analysis and Critical Realism [J].
Buch-Hansen, Hubert .
JOURNAL FOR THE THEORY OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR, 2014, 44 (03) :306-325
[10]   Content analysis within intangible assets disclosure: a structured literature review [J].
Castilla-Polo, Francisca ;
Ruiz-Rodriguez, Consuelo .
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2017, 18 (03) :506-543