A neuroprotective role of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor following moderate spinal cord contusion injury

被引:103
作者
Iannotti, C [1 ]
Zhang, YP [1 ]
Shields, CB [1 ]
Han, YC [1 ]
Burke, DA [1 ]
Xu, XM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Dept Neurol Surg, Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Res Ctr, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
关键词
contusion; GDNF; neuroprotection; neurotrophic factors; spinal cord injury; tcMMEP;
D O I
10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.05.033
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The present study investigated neuroprotective effects of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), a distant member of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily, following moderate contusive spinal cord injury (SCI) in adult rats. A T11 spinal cord contusion injury was made using an Infinite Horizon impactor (IH; impact force = 150 kDyn) and recombinant human GDNF at two concentrations (rhGDNF; 1 or 5 mug/mul), or saline vehicle was delivered intrathecally for 28 days using an Alzet miniosmotic pump. We demonstrated that, at 7 weeks postinjury, GDNF infusion significantly reduced the total lesion volume by 34-42% (assessed stereologically) and increased the percentage of white matter sparing by 10-13% (measured at the injury epicenter), as compared to the vehicle infusion. Retrograde tracing revealed that GDNF infusion resulted in a significant increase in the number of FluoroGold (FG)-labeled neurons in propriospinal regions as well as in two supraspinal regions, that is, the medullary and pontine reticular formation, and the lateral vestibular nucleus. Immunofluorescent staining confirmed that the spared white matter contained neurofilament-positive axons. However, transcranial magnetic motor-evoked potential (tcMMEP) assessment revealed no significant difference in onset latency and amplitude between the GDNF- and vehicle-infused groups. These results suggest that GDNF has a strong neuroprotective effect on white matter sparing and the sparing of a subset of proprio- and supraspinal axons following injury. However, a return of tcMMEPs requires the sparing and/or myelination of axons in a defined region of the white matter which was either not spared or remyelinated at this level of injury severity. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 332
页数:16
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   EFFECTS OF SELECTIVE SPINAL-CORD LESIONS ON THE SPINAL MOTOR EVOKED-POTENTIAL (MEP) IN THE RAT [J].
ADAMSON, J ;
ZAPPULLA, RA ;
FRASER, A ;
RYDER, J ;
MALIS, LI .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 74 (06) :469-480
[2]   Pegylated brain-derived neurotrophic factor shows improved distribution into the spinal cord and stimulates locomotor activity and morphological changes after injury [J].
Ankeny, DP ;
McTigue, DM ;
Guan, Z ;
Yan, Q ;
Kinstler, O ;
Stokes, BT ;
Jakeman, LB .
EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 2001, 170 (01) :85-100
[3]   Regulation of GDNF expression in cultured astrocytes by inflammatory stimuli [J].
Appel, E ;
Kolman, O ;
Kazimirsky, G ;
Blumberg, PM ;
Brodie, C .
NEUROREPORT, 1997, 8 (15) :3309-3312
[4]  
BALENTINE JD, 1978, LAB INVEST, V39, P236
[5]  
BALENTINE JD, 1978, LAB INVEST, V39, P254
[6]   Neurotrophins BDNF and NT-3 promote axonal re-entry into the distal host spinal cord through Schwann cell-seeded mini-channels [J].
Bamber, NI ;
Li, HY ;
Lu, XB ;
Oudega, M ;
Aebischer, P ;
Xu, XM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 13 (02) :257-268
[7]  
BLIGHT AR, 1992, J NEUROTRAUM, V9, pS83
[8]   MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTAL SPINAL-CORD INJURY IN THE CAT - THE RELATION OF INJURY INTENSITY TO SURVIVAL OF MYELINATED AXONS [J].
BLIGHT, AR ;
DECRESCITO, V .
NEUROSCIENCE, 1986, 19 (01) :321-+
[9]   NT-3 promotes growth of lesioned adult rat sensory axons ascending in the dorsal columns of the spinal cord [J].
Bradbury, EJ ;
Khemani, S ;
King, VR ;
Priestley, JV ;
McMahon, SB .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 11 (11) :3873-3883
[10]   Reactive astrocytes of the quinolinc acid-lesioned rat striatum express GFRα1 as well as GDNF in vivo [J].
Bresjanac, M ;
Antauer, G .
EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 2000, 164 (01) :53-59