A Validation Study of a Novel 3-Dimensional MRI Modeling Technique to Identify the Anatomic Insertions of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament

被引:8
作者
Hui, Catherine [1 ]
Pi, Yeli [1 ]
Swami, Vimarsha [1 ]
Mabee, Myles [1 ]
Jaremko, Jacob L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
来源
ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2016年 / 4卷 / 12期
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament; reconstruction; footprints; arthroscopy; ACL RECONSTRUCTION; KNEE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; BUNDLES; ATTACHMENTS; INJURY; PREVALENCE; PLACEMENT; POSITION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1177/2325967116673797
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Anatomic single bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the current gold standard in ACL reconstructive surgery. However, placement of femoral and tibial tunnels at the anatomic center of the ACL insertion sites can be difficult intraoperatively. We developed a "virtual arthroscopy" program that allows users to identify ACL insertions on preoperative knee magnetic resonance images (MRIs) and generates a 3-dimensional (3D) bone model that matches the arthroscopic view to help guide intraoperative tunnel placement. Purpose: To test the validity of the ACL insertion sites identified using our 3D modeling program and to determine the accuracy of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction guided by our "virtual arthroscopic" model. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Sixteen cadaveric knees were prescanned using routine MRI sequences. A trained, blinded observer then identified the center of the ACL insertions using our program. Eight knees were dissected, and the centers of the ACL footprints were marked with a screw. In the remaining 8 knees, arthroscopic ACL tunnels were drilled into the center of the ACL footprints based on landmarks identified using our virtual arthroscopic model. Postprocedural MRI was performed on all 16 knees. The 3D distance between pre- and postoperative 3D centers of the ACL were calculated by 2 trained, blinded observers and a musculoskeletal radiologist. Results: With 2 outliers removed, the postoperative femoral and tibial tunnel placements in the open specimens differed by 2.5 +/- 0.9 mm and 2.9 +/- 0.7 mm from preoperative centers identified on MRI. Postoperative femoral and tibial tunnel centers in the arthroscopic specimens differed by 3.2 +/- 0.9 mm and 2.9 +/- 0.7 mm, respectively. Conclusion: Our results show that MRI-based 3D localization of the ACL and our virtual arthroscopic modeling program is feasible and does not show a statistically significant difference to an open arthrotomy approach. However, additional refinements will be required to improve the accuracy and consistency of our model to make this an effective tool for surgeons performing anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstructions. Clinical Relevance: Arthroscopic anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction is the current gold standard for ACL reconstruction; however, the center of the ACL footprint can be difficult to identify arthroscopically. Our novel modeling can improve the identification of this important landmark intraoperatively and decrease the risk of graft malposition and subsequent graft failure.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Remnant Preservation and a Femoral Tensioning Technique: Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Results
    Ahn, Jin Hwan
    Wang, Joon Ho
    Lee, Yong Seuk
    Kim, Jae Gyoon
    Kang, Jun Hee
    Koh, Kyoung Hwan
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (08) : 1079 - 1089
  • [2] How to optimize the use of MRI in anatomic ACL reconstruction
    Araujo, Paulo
    van Eck, Carola F.
    Torabi, Maha
    Fu, Freddie H.
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2013, 21 (07) : 1495 - 1501
  • [3] Does ACL Reconstruction Alter Natural History? A Systematic Literature Review of Long-Term Outcomes
    Chalmers, Peter N.
    Mall, Nathan A.
    Moric, Mario
    Sherman, Seth L.
    Paletta, George P.
    Cole, Brian J.
    Bach, Bernard R., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 96A (04) : 292 - 300
  • [4] Morphology of anterior cruciate ligament attachments for anatomic reconstruction: A cadaveric dissection and radiographic study
    Colombet, Philippe
    Robinson, James
    Christel, Pascal
    Franceschi, Jean-Pierre
    Djian, Patrick
    Bellier, Guy
    Sbihi, Abdou
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2006, 22 (09) : 984 - 992
  • [5] Magnetic resonance imaging versus arthroscopy in the diagnosis of knee pathology, concentrating on meniscal lesions and ACL tears: a systematic review
    Crawford, Ruth
    Walley, Gayle
    Bridgman, Stephen
    Maffulli, Nicola
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2007, 84 : 5 - 23
  • [6] Osteoarthritis of the knee in retired, elite Australian Rules footballers
    Deacon, A
    Bennell, K
    Kiss, ZS
    Crossley, K
    Brukner, P
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1997, 166 (04) : 187 - 190
  • [7] Lateral radiographic study of the tibial sagital insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of human anterior cruciate ligament
    Doi, Mitsuhito
    Takahashi, Masaaki
    Abe, Masashi
    Suzuki, Daisuke
    Nagano, Akira
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2009, 17 (04) : 347 - 351
  • [8] The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the risk of knee reinjury
    Dunn, WR
    Lyman, S
    Lincoln, AE
    Amoroso, PJ
    Wickiewicz, T
    Marx, RG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (08) : 1906 - 1914
  • [9] Kim Ha Sung, 2013, Knee Surg Relat Res, V25, P165, DOI 10.5792/ksrr.2013.25.4.165
  • [10] The attachments of the anteromedial and posterolateral fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament - Part 2: Femoral attachment
    Edwards, Andrew
    Bull, Anthony M. J.
    Amis, Andrew A.
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2008, 16 (01) : 29 - 36