The Ultimatum Game in complex networks

被引:72
|
作者
Sinatra, R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Iranzo, J. [4 ,5 ]
Gomez-Gardenes, J. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Floria, L. M. [5 ,7 ]
Latora, V. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Moreno, Y. [8 ]
机构
[1] Scuola Super Catania, Lab Sistemi Complessi, I-95123 Catania, Italy
[2] Catania Univ, Dipartimento Fis & Astron, I-95123 Catania, Italy
[3] Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, I-95123 Catania, Italy
[4] Ctr Astrobiol CSIC INTA, Madrid 28850, Spain
[5] Univ Zaragoza, Inst Biocomputat & Phys Complex Syst BIFI, E-50009 Zaragoza, Spain
[6] Univ Rey Juan Carlos, ESCET, Dept Matemat Aplicada, Madrid 28933, Spain
[7] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Fis Mat Condensada, E-50009 Zaragoza, Spain
[8] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Theoret Phys, E-50009 Zaragoza, Spain
来源
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS-THEORY AND EXPERIMENT | 2009年
关键词
network dynamics; applications to game theory and mathematical economics; socio-economic networks; ALTRUISTIC PUNISHMENT; COOPERATION; EVOLUTION; BEHAVIOR; MODEL;
D O I
10.1088/1742-5468/2009/09/P09012
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
We address the problem of how cooperative (altruistic-like) behavior arises in natural and social systems by analyzing an Ultimatum Game in complex networks. Specifically, players of three types are considered: (a) empathetic, whose aspiration levels, and offers, are equal, (b) pragmatic, who do not distinguish between the different roles and aim to obtain the same benefit, and (c) agents whose aspiration levels, and offers, are independent. We analyze the asymptotic behavior of pure populations with different topologies using two kinds of strategic update rules: natural selection, which relies on replicator dynamics, and social penalty, inspired by the Bak-Sneppen dynamics, in which players are subject to a social selection rule penalizing not only the less fit individuals, butalso their first neighbors. We discuss the emergence of fairness in the different settings and network topologies.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Evolution of Generosity in the Ultimatum Game
    Hintze, Arend
    Hertwig, Ralph
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [22] The Role of Cognitive and Emotional Perspective Taking in Economic Decision Making in the Ultimatum Game
    Takagishi, Haruto
    Koizumi, Michiko
    Fujii, Takayuki
    Schug, Joanna
    Kameshima, Shinya
    Yamagishi, Toshio
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (09):
  • [23] The evolution of fairness in the ultimatum game
    Chiang, Yen-Sheng
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL SOCIOLOGY, 2007, 31 (02) : 175 - 186
  • [24] Strong reciprocity, social structure, and the evolution of fair allocations in a simulated ultimatum game
    Shutters, Shade T.
    COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL ORGANIZATION THEORY, 2009, 15 (02) : 64 - 77
  • [25] The ultimatum game: Discrete vs. continuous offers
    Dishon-Berkovits, Miriam
    Berkovits, Richard
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2014, 409 : 53 - 60
  • [26] Local competition sparks concerns for fairness in the ultimatum game
    Barclay, Pat
    Stoller, Benjamin
    BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 10 (05)
  • [27] The Dynamics of the Discrete Ultimatum Game and the Role of the Expectation Level
    Deng, Lili
    Zhang, Wei
    Wang, Cheng
    Han, Yi
    Cai, Jianhu
    DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2016, 2016
  • [28] Role polarization and its effects in the spatial ultimatum game
    Yang, Zhihu
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2023, 108 (02)
  • [29] Fairness evolution in the ultimatum game is a function of reward size
    Hardling, Roger
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2007, 246 (04) : 720 - 724
  • [30] An Extended Ultimatum Game for Multi-Party Access Control in Social Networks
    Squicciarini, Anna
    Rajtmajer, Sarah
    Gao, Yang
    Semonsen, Justin
    Belmonte, Andrew
    Agarwal, Pratik
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON THE WEB, 2022, 16 (03)