The Impact of Land Use Change on Disaster Risk from the Perspective of Efficiency

被引:18
作者
Su, Qingmu [1 ]
Chen, Kaida [1 ,2 ]
Liao, Lingyun [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Urban Planning, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
[2] Fujian Agr & Forestry Univ, Sch Landscape Architecture, Landscape Architecture, Fuzhou 350002, Peoples R China
关键词
land use change; disaster risk; three-stage DEA model; efficiency; risk assessment; ZOIGE PLATEAU; FLOOD RISK; URBANIZATION; MANAGEMENT; REDUCTION; FRAMEWORK; WETLAND;
D O I
10.3390/su13063151
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The increasing demand of humankind has caused a large number of land use changes, which pose a direct or indirect threat to the environment while promoting economic growth. The lack of risk-oriented land use changes may increase the disaster risk in the region. Therefore, how to study the relationship between land use change and disaster risk deserves attention. In this study, a research framework with quantitative relationship between land use change and disaster risk was constructed from the perspective of efficiency. The framework integrated land use change, disaster losses and environment variable (runoff increment) into a three-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) assessment model to dynamically evaluate the impact of land use changes on disasters. The main conclusions include: (I) after the influence of runoff increment and random error was excluded, the overall risk score of counties and cities in Taiwan is 0.643, which represents a relatively high level, indicating that land use changes have caused high disaster risk; and (II) the vulnerability of land development in each county and city can be obtained through the comprehensive score of disaster risk the amount of unused input. The results of this study can help government agencies to rank various types of land development and then determine the acceptable risk level and incorporate disaster risk into land development.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Drivers of changing urban flood risk: A framework for action [J].
Berndtsson, R. ;
Becker, P. ;
Persson, A. ;
Aspegren, H. ;
Haghighatafshar, S. ;
Jonsson, K. ;
Larsson, R. ;
Mobini, S. ;
Mottaghi, M. ;
Nilsson, J. ;
Nordstrom, J. ;
Pilesjo, P. ;
Scholz, M. ;
Sternudd, C. ;
Sorensen, J. ;
Tussupova, K. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 240 :47-56
[2]  
Central Disaster Prevention and Response Council, 2020, DISASTER PREVENTION
[3]   Exploring the coupling relationship of stormwater runoff distribution in watershed from the perspective of fairness [J].
Chang, Hsueh-Sheng ;
Su, Qingmu .
URBAN CLIMATE, 2021, 36
[4]   Research on establishment of the region flood protection standard-a case of watershed of Dajiaxi, Taiwan [J].
Chang, Hsueh-Sheng ;
Su, Qingmu ;
Katayama, Takahiro .
URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2021, 18 (03) :173-182
[5]   Research on constructing sponge city indicator and decision evaluation model with fuzzy multiple criteria method [J].
Chang, Hsueh-Sheng ;
Su, Qingmu .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2020, 92 (11) :1910-1921
[6]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[7]   Coping and adaptation strategies and institutional perceptions of hydrological risk in an urban Amazonian city [J].
De Andrade, Milena Marilia Nogueira ;
Szlafsztein, Claudio Fabian .
DISASTERS, 2020, 44 (04) :708-725
[8]   Shoreline change assessment using multi-temporal satellite images: a case study of Lake Sapanca, NW Turkey [J].
Duru, Umit .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2017, 189 (08)
[9]   Environmental and economic risks assessment under climate changes for three land uses scenarios analysis across Teshio watershed, northernmost of Japan [J].
Fan, Min ;
Shibata, Hideaki ;
Chen, Li .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 599 :451-463
[10]   Water yield, nitrogen and sediment retentions in Northern Japan (Teshio river watershed): land use change scenario analysis [J].
Fan, Min ;
Shibata, Hideaki .
MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2016, 21 (01) :119-133