Revisiting the old debate: citizens' perceptions of meritocracy in public and private organizations

被引:9
作者
Suzuki, Kohei [1 ]
Hur, Hyunkang [2 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Inst Publ Adm, The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Indiana Univ Kokomo, Sch Business, Dept Publ Adm & Hlth Management, Bloomington, IN USA
关键词
Public-private comparison; sector differences; Weberian bureaucracy; meritocracy; comparative public administration; management; CIVIL-SERVICE SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT; QUALITY; SECTOR; REGIONS; EUROPE; STATE; PERFORMANCE; BUREAUCRACY;
D O I
10.1080/14719037.2021.1895545
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Public management scholars have long debated public and private sector differences. However, the generalizability of empirical results has been limited due to the shortage of cross-national studies. Using a data set including citizens in twenty-one European countries, we compare citizens' perceptions of meritocracy (i.e. hard work determines success rather than luck or connections) in public and private organizations and test how such sector differences are linked to country-level macro factors. We find that sector differences in meritocracy exist in almost all European regions. However, sector differences are smaller in countries where NPM practices and meritocratic principles are established.
引用
收藏
页码:1226 / 1250
页数:25
相关论文
共 108 条
[51]  
Kim CH, 2017, ECON SOCIOL, V10, P112, DOI 10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-1/8
[52]   Political appointments, civil service systems, and bureaucratic competence: Organizational balancing and executive branch revenue forecasts in the American States [J].
Krause, George A. ;
Lewis, David E. ;
Douglas, James W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 50 (03) :770-787
[53]  
Kuhlmann S., 2019, Introduction to Comparative Public Administration: Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe
[54]  
L?greid P., 2017, OXFORD RES ENCY POLI
[55]   The effects of new public management on the quality of public services [J].
Lapuente, Victor ;
Van de Walle, Steven .
GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS, 2020, 33 (03) :461-475
[56]   Politicization, Bureaucratic Legalism, and Innovative Attitudes in the Public Sector [J].
Lapuente, Victor ;
Suzuki, Kohei .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2020, 80 (03) :454-467
[57]  
Lgreid Per., 2015, COMP CIVIL SERVICE S, P203
[58]   COMPARABLE-CASES STRATEGY IN COMPARATIVE RESEARCH [J].
LIJPHART, A .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 1975, 8 (02) :158-177
[59]   A comparison of the values and commitment of private sector, public sector, and parapublic sector employees [J].
Lyons, Sean T. ;
Duxbury, Linda E. ;
Higgins, Christopher A. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2006, 66 (04) :605-618
[60]   Primes and Consequences: A Systematic Review of Meritocracy in Intergroup Relations [J].
Madeira, Ana Filipa ;
Costa-Lopes, Rui ;
Dovidio, John F. ;
Freitas, Goncalo ;
Mascarenhas, Mafalda F. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10