Willingness to pay for safe drinking water: Evidence from Parral, Mexico

被引:110
|
作者
Vasquez, William F. [1 ]
Mozumder, Pallab [2 ,3 ]
Hernandez-Arce, Jesus [4 ]
Berrens, Robert P. [5 ]
机构
[1] Fairfield Univ, Dept Econ, Fairfield, CT 06824 USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Dept Earth & Environm, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[3] Florida Int Univ, Int Hurricane Res Ctr, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[4] Univ Autonoma Chihuahua, Escuela Econ Int, Mexico City 33820, DF, Mexico
[5] Univ New Mexico, Dept Econ, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
Contingent valuation; Drinking water; Mexico; Uncertainty; Water system reliability; Willingness to pay; CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEYS; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; SUPPLY RELIABILITY; HYPOTHETICAL BIAS; CHOICE; EXPENDITURES; PREFERENCES; INFORMATION; MECHANISMS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.05.009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A referendum-format contingent valuation (CV) survey is used to elicit household willingness to pay responses for safe and reliable drinking water in Parral, Mexico. Households currently adopt a variety of averting and private investment choices (e.g., bottled water consumption, home-based water treatment, and installation of water storage facilities) to adapt to the existing water supply system. These revealed behaviors indicate the latent demand for safer and more reliable water services, which is corroborated by the CV survey evidence. Validity findings include significant scope sensitivity in WTP for water services. Further, results indicate that households are willing to pay from 1.8% to 7.55% of reported household income above their current water bill for safe and reliable drinking water services, depending upon the assumptions about response uncertainty. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3391 / 3400
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Willingness to pay for safe drinking water: A contingent valuation study in Jacksonville, FL
    Chatterjee, Chiradip
    Triplett, Russell
    Johnson, Christopher K.
    Ahmed, Parvez
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 203 : 413 - 421
  • [2] User preferences and willingness to pay for safe drinking water: Experimental evidence from rural Tanzania
    Burt, Zachary
    Njee, Robert M.
    Mbatia, Yolanda
    Msimbe, Veritas
    Brown, Joe
    Clasen, Thomas F.
    Malebo, Hamisi M.
    Ray, Isha
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2017, 173 : 63 - 71
  • [3] Household's willingness to pay for arsenic safe drinking water in Bangladesh
    Khan, Nasreen Islam
    Brouwer, Roy
    Yang, Hong
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 143 : 151 - 161
  • [5] Awareness of coping costs and willingness to pay for urban drinking water service: Evidence from Lahore, Pakistan
    Hasan, Syed M.
    Akram, Agha Ali
    Jeuland, Marc
    UTILITIES POLICY, 2021, 71
  • [6] Water Quality and Willingness to Pay for Safe Drinking Water in Tala Upazila in a Coastal District of Bangladesh
    Nepal C. Dey
    Mahmood Parvez
    Ratnajit Saha
    Mir Raihanul Islam
    Tahera Akter
    Mahfuzar Rahman
    Milan Barua
    Akramul Islam
    Exposure and Health, 2019, 11 : 297 - 310
  • [7] Water Quality and Willingness to Pay for Safe Drinking Water in Tala Upazila in a Coastal District of Bangladesh
    Dey, Nepal C.
    Parvez, Mahmood
    Saha, Ratnajit
    Islam, Mir Raihanul
    Akter, Tahera
    Rahman, Mahfuzar
    Barua, Milan
    Islam, Akramul
    EXPOSURE AND HEALTH, 2019, 11 (04) : 297 - 310
  • [8] Willingness to pay for reliable supplies of safe drinking water in Guatemala: A referendum contingent valuation study
    Vasquez, William F.
    Espaillat, Ricardo
    URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2016, 13 (03) : 284 - 292
  • [9] Willingness to pay for improved safe drinking water in a coastal urban area in Bangladesh
    Ahsan, Md. Nasif
    Hadiujjaman, Sheikh
    Islam, Md. Sariful
    Nasrin, Nishad
    Akter, Mukta
    Parvin, Gulshan Ara
    Hossain, Md. Sarwar
    WATER POLICY, 2021, 23 (03) : 633 - 653
  • [10] Willingness to pay for reliable piped water services: evidence from urban Ghana
    Amoah, Anthony
    Moffatt, Peter G.
    ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY STUDIES, 2021, 23 (04) : 805 - 829